The man who suggested people drink bleach during the COVID pandemic

This honestly blew my mind, and I don’t think he’s ever topped this level of stupid. To this day it may be the dumbest thing he ever said. I’m just in awe of this reality.

I mean “its back” in the sense that demand is rising for nostalgic purposes. Not in the sense that anyone wants a new one.

What lack of privacy are you referring to?

I think one critique of the fediverse is the lack of privacy

What? By whom? How?

Pretty sure they just take the time to wait and see if the show is successful before firing up a new season. If it flops, that’s a huge L developing a new season that no one will watch.

If I were a Republican I’d be arguing that there’s no way Americans didn’t already know he was incompetent when voting for him.

She revealed that production is expected to begin in the fall later this year.

SYAC

That’s pretty cool but they’re also going to be subjecting themselves to a very high level of scrutiny.

I uninstalled Google.

You can (and should) also disable Play Protect.

They all suck and should be avoided.

You entered a thread explicitly about E2E encryption started by ShortN0te

That person replied to a thread I started, not the other way around. It was never about E2E. It was always about encrypted backups.

It could have a encrypted backup feature but it won’t change it’s fundamental purpose

It’s not supposed to. It shouldn’t.

They’re meant to be workable in other tools like QGIS, Strava or Komoot. Encrypting them would break that entirely.

Then make it optional? Or don’t, I don’t care.

deleted by creator

Halfway through you shifted to encrypted local backups

I never shifted anything. I was talking about encrypted backups on a server. These can be encrypted locally before being synced to a server.

you first called ‘single-party encryption’

Nope, you literally just made that up. I didn’t say that and I don’t even know what that means.

I said it wasn’t realistic in the context of the selfhosted backends we were discussing.

…but it is.

And yes, lots of apps do encrypted backups because they are backup apps. Colota isn’t.

My suggestion was that it could be…

The existing export is for tools like QGIS or selfhosted backends and encrypting that data would break that use case entirely.

You already have local backups that could be encrypted and then synced to a general storage server.

Encrypted import/export for backup is a separate feature that doesn’t exist yet, so there’s nothing here that’s badly implemented.

I said literally nothing about your implementation. You’re imagining things. Please read more attentively.

Never heard of “The President”, what’s that?

He lives by the narcissist’s prayer 🙏

Most likely just stolen from another poster without attribution.

“Oh yeah well we’ll double blockade the strait! What now, losers!?”

If you watch older videos of him from the 80s he actually looks fairly sane. He’s been experiencing Trump Derangement Syndrome for decades though.

What debate? Anyone suggesting otherwise is just being disingenuous or are themselves insane or a lunatic.

I don’t know what you want man

I honestly don’t know how to be more clear about this. It’s not complicated. I want client-side encryption, man.

i didn’t realize this was one of those “digging my heels in because I don’t know how to be wrong” threads

LOL I didn’t know that either, but here you are!