

They’re not stupid or delusional. The people they’re talking to are, and they know it.


They’re not stupid or delusional. The people they’re talking to are, and they know it.


Screenshots have metadata also 🙂


The reasons are literally in the image you provided.
Regardless, even if they did, that’s certainly not exclusive to the fedi.


Maybe they didn’t like that it was then given to people for free
Yeah, I mean, it’s mostly that.


I use scrambled exif. Works well but only when sharing photos, it can’t erase metadata from your library.


Yeah I know, I didn’t bother to correct it because it’s still equally stupid.


Again, the concept of using an injected antiviral was given to him by Stanford
I don’t understand how you think that’s a defense of any kind.


I don’t think you can claim there’s a “lack of privacy” when things that are intended to be public…are made public.


The man who suggested people drink bleach during the COVID pandemic
This honestly blew my mind, and I don’t think he’s ever topped this level of stupid. To this day it may be the dumbest thing he ever said. I’m just in awe of this reality.


I mean “its back” in the sense that demand is rising for nostalgic purposes. Not in the sense that anyone wants a new one.


What lack of privacy are you referring to?


I think one critique of the fediverse is the lack of privacy
What? By whom? How?
E: why am I being downvoted for asking a question?


Pretty sure they just take the time to wait and see if the show is successful before firing up a new season. If it flops, that’s a huge L developing a new season that no one will watch.


If I were a Republican I’d be arguing that there’s no way Americans didn’t already know he was incompetent when voting for him.


She revealed that production is expected to begin in the fall later this year.
SYAC


That’s pretty cool but they’re also going to be subjecting themselves to a very high level of scrutiny.


I uninstalled Google.
You can (and should) also disable Play Protect.


They all suck and should be avoided.


You entered a thread explicitly about E2E encryption started by ShortN0te
That person replied to a thread I started, not the other way around. It was never about E2E. It was always about encrypted backups.
It could have a encrypted backup feature but it won’t change it’s fundamental purpose
It’s not supposed to. It shouldn’t.
They’re meant to be workable in other tools like QGIS, Strava or Komoot. Encrypting them would break that entirely.
Then make it optional? Or don’t, I don’t care.
…they aren’t public.