

Seems they did bring a poet.


Seems they did bring a poet.


The overwhelming majority of consumers will never install an OS on a system.
They will only ever use the OS that came pre-installed.


Supporting a harmful entity just because they are in a conflict with someone worse is not a responsible thing to do.


Why would you support either?


Worked pretty well for turkey, they shot down 2 russian fighter jets, resulting in the death of 1 pilot. Russia did not violate their airspace again.


Not necessarily no, the calls for a no fly zone are mostly asking for it over western Ukraine. Russian manned planes don’t fly that deep into Ukraine, much too dangerous, so a no fly zone over that area would only shoot down unmanned objects, drones and missiles.
The problem they’re faced with is a drug epidemic and the solution they come up with is mass murder.
Obviously very sane and rational.
Would you like to build a better future?


The deadline to meet the new 5%/3.5% spending target is 2035, the level of motivation to reach it quickly varies quite a bit from country to country.


The thretened tariffs arent on Russia, since as you point out there is little trade between USA and Russia it would be innefective in swaying the kremlin. These tariffs are instead being put on countries that trade with Russia like China, India, Brazil etc, with the hope that those countries will put pressure on Russia by proxy.


You’re gonna need to come up with a better example, when covid hit a and fewer people where buying plane tickets there where a lot fewer planes in the air. Companies usually want to be as cost effective as possible, meaning they will do the least amount of work needed to still get their customers money.
One big problem that regulation can tackle is that corporations seek to externalize as much of their costs as they can, which means the corporation won’t have to pay for the externalized cost, so they can sell their good/service cheaper, so consumption of the product increases, leading to an outsized environmental/societal cost compared to the cost of the product.


Private servers are not always a viable alternative option for players as the protections we put in place to secure players’ data, remove illegal content, and combat unsafe community content would not exist and would leave rights holders liable
Straight fucking lie, the ones liable are the uploader and the host, which after official support ends is no longer the rights holders.
The type of verification depends on the country and some don’t have any verification at signing. I’m Swedish and when I signed I just filled out a form, no checks of any kind.


Can confirm as a swede, when I signed I just filled out a form with no verification of any kind.
That this is how the us gets a national registry is so hilariously fitting.


Not every conflict has a good guy, there are no good guys, the Khamenei regime is evil and so is the leadership of Isreal. Just because the latter attacked the former does not make them innocent, let the bastards burn and pity the civilian.


Being for the destruction of all art history is certainly the wildest take I’ve ever seen on this issue.


You’re damn right I don’t like it, I especially don’t like how it destroys art history, which is why I’m part of this campaign to make that practice illegal.


It’s astonishing to me how even right here on Lemmy so many people still misunderstand what this is about with comments saying that piracy fixes it or that downloading the game installer solves the issue. The games where those things are options aren’t what this effort is about, this is about games like Darkspore, Defiance, Tabula Rasa, and our prototypical example The Crew, where there is no one who can play them no matter where, how, or when, they acquired the game, it is impossible to play for anyone, the whole piece of art has been destroyed.
Honestly if we can’t even communicate what the movement is about to those who aught to be our base it really does not bode well for gaining any kind of wider traction.
Why have all these “x-point plan” been so horrifically poorly written?
14 A is a sentence fragment that has no meaning.
5 B, Does not restrict Ukraine from continuing the war to reclaim it’s territory since the occupied areas are not “Russian territory” and it simultaneously states that if Russia militarily opposes that recapture it would trigger the security guarantees and enter NATO into war with Russia.
18, “as soon as possible” is such a cliche contract trap, just write 6 months and there wont be any arguing.
It’s like a child wrote it, but this is being presented in a serious international forum. The original one from Russia and Europe’s modification thereof were also just absolute garbage.