The bloodlust and cruelty is the point.

So we should do the “civil” thing and be reasonable by meeting them half-way… So a little bit of bloodlust and cruelty is the balanced and sensible approach? How about we try and talk to these people, and be more inclusive? /s

I mean there’s one kind of culture in America where bloodlust and cruelty is the point, but then there’s the other side of America that tolerates it as “just one of those things.” “I don’t like it, but it is what it is, therefore it is acceptable.”

Because there’s no consequences.

A kalashnikov would be more accurate

I once saw a guy on LSD running around the NYC streets in his underpants after a Shpongle concert back in '10. He made more sense than you do.

And so are all of our capitalist-sponsored leaders.

How about “shoot the fascists” rather than “arm the (insert someone else other than me)”

Hitler might’ve killed someone in WW1. Irregardless, Hitler had a whole big group of Charlie Kirks that helped convince millions of Germans to commit atrocoties. Hitler would’ve been nothing without his Charlie Kirks.

Well, 100% of the people you’ve met so far haven’t killed you. I would argue that at least 95% of the people you’ve ever encountered have been good, in fact.

Out of all the people you’ve encountered or interacted with, how many times were you murdered?

You sound like a very sad and lonely individual.

During natural disasters where society and infrastructure completely collapses and is destroyed, it is in human DNA to help eachother, collaborate, cooperate, and rebuild. Your ‘ape-based species’ bullshit is not founded in science, but founded by eugenisists stupid enough to look at apes and say “we’re like, the same.”

Human history is nothing but a series of people figuring out how to get along with eachother. People who focus on all the war and violence stuff are scary, and need some serious professional help. Yes, I’m talking about you, HugeNerd.

They pretty much are.

No, I doubt he was conscious for long enough to know he was shot. A neck shot like that he might as well have been shot in the head, to him it was probably instant.

Most people reading this comment don’t even know the names of the two politicans assassinated recently. Everyone knows the name Charlie Kirk.

Good. Remember how much the left loves fascists, hasn’t even been a hundred years since millions of leftists died trying to stop them. I bet you get salty about that antifa movie called ‘Saving Private Ryan.’

‘Fencing response’ is conducive with brain damage. Sudden blood pressure drop to the brain can cause that response. Practically speaking he died instantly, a neck shot like that might as well have been a head shot.

That was a clean slice to the throat and the guy was conscious for several moments afterwards. Kirk took a gunshot wound into/through the neck, pretty much all the blood in his head fell out within seconds, and he immediately lost consciousness.

You may not be wrong, but that doesn’t make you right.

By definition that makes them all rightwing authoritarians aka fascists, which checks out.

they can’t hold back much more than one person each if those people want through.

Keyword “IF” those people want through. A lot of people still seem to think the world would crumble without billionaires, but that vibe is visibly shifting which is nice to see.

What a “centrist” guy this billionaire Trump supporter is.