Ayyyyy Oneshot

Still uses windows 7 but says he’s using some linux distro like steamOS

Now draw her happily and blissfully eating a burger

Is this some kind of distraction or whataboutism article for ICE?

And they call it all “political interference in an American business”

If nothing else, that tells you all there is to know about American politics, and their way of business

Then these things are not allowed on the road, full stop.

If they’re not respecting traffic rules, they’re not abiding by the law, and so they’re legally not allowed.

Tbh if you’re not meowing on the emergency frequency, then are you really meowing?

Believe it or not I have this meme from 2023

Sorry for not having it on hand, and thanks for finding it!

This is fucking diabolical and 100% accurate

Sorry, thank you!

I can do anything!

I got flashed in the train unfortunately

Went ahead and just sent more memes to clear out the timeline

Strange?

I’m not American

I’m just waiting until y’all either to implode into civil war or decide to wipe this shitstain off the planet earth

I don’t need to fucking deal with this; clean up your mess, or we’ll probably meet in The Hague, one way or another

Well, you’re not succeeding at solidarity, have fun.

You’d be having a bigger effect being angry on Twitter then, instead of (effectively) incentivising infighting in a social media predominantly inhabited by the people who are opposing all of these atrocities

You’re doing a real good job of making me go “idgaf about Americans” with this non-solidarity, because from what I’m seeing you’re only driving people (with similar interests) away that could join in opposition to trump

I hope you’re happy with trump, then, because apparently you want to be.

As with everything, consenting adults make almost any court case between two people effectively null, unless the state asserts its authority (as is with certain types of injury), and/or when it pertains to other people (when person A tries to tell person C that they own person B, and such try to claim control of various processes, etc.)

I’d be interested in how much the law would allow or understand those cases, or in which cases the state is allowed (without either party filing claims) to step in by itself. (Which there’s a specific word for, but I forgot it)

It’s an attempt on intimidation, because supposedly for the person travelling it’s a lose-lose:

• provide all your data, and allow the US government (and any connected entities (big tech)) to use it to track and sell that data
• don’t provide all your data, and when the US government suspects that you did that, they can bar entry for little reason, and/or have legal grounds(/excuse) for go after you

All around it’s a humiliation and intimidation exercise