A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.

I just don’t see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    The worst part is that this problem has already been solved by using LIDAR. Vegas had fully self-driving cars that I saw perform flawlessly, because they were manufactured by a company that doesn’t skimp on tech and rip people off.

    • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except for the last 0.05 seconds before the crash where the human was put in control. Therefore, the human caused the crash.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    The car made a fatal decision faster than any human could possibly correct it. Tesla’s idea that drivers can “supervise” these systems is, at this point, nothing more than a legal loophole.

    What I don’t get is how this false advertising for years hasn’t caused Tesla bankruptcy already?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        To put your number into perspective, if it only failed 1 time in every hundred miles, it would kill you multiple times a week with the average commute distance.

        • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone who doesn’t understand math downvoted you. This is the right framework to understand autonomy, the failure rate needs to be astonishingly low for the product to have any non-negative value. So far, Tesla has not demonstrated non-negative value in a credible way.

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are trying to judge the self driving feature in a vacuum. And you can’t do that. You need to compare it to any alternatives. And for automotive travel, the alternative to FSD is to continue to have everyone drive manually. Turns out, most clowns doing that are statistically worse at it than even FSD, (as bad as it is). So, FSD doesn’t need to be perfect-- it just needs to be a bit better than what the average driver can do driving manually. And the last time I saw anything about that, FSD was that “bit better” than you statistically.

            FSD isn’t perfect. No such system will ever be perfect. But, the goal isn’t perfect, it just needs to be better than you.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              FSD isn’t perfect. No such system will ever be perfect. But, the goal isn’t perfect, it just needs to be better than you.

              Yeah people keep bringing that up as a counter arguement but I’m pretty certain humans don’t swerve off a perfectly straight road into a tree all that often.

              So unless you have numbers to suggest that humans are less safe than FSD then you’re being equally obtuse.

              • bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A simple google search, (which YOU could have done yourself), shows it’s abut 1 in 1.5 million miles driven per accident with FSD vs 1 in 700,000 miles driven for mechanical cars. I’m no Teslastan, (I think they are over priced and deliberately for rich people only), but that’s an improvement, a noticeable improvement.

                And as a an old retired medic who has done his share of car accidents over nearly 20 years-- Yes, yes humans swerve off of perfectly straight roads and hit trees and anything else in the way also. And do so at a higher rate.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          …It absolutely fails miserably fairly often and would likely crash that frequently without human intervention, though. Not to the extent here, where there isn’t even time for human intervention, but I frequently had to take over when I used to use it (post v13)

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s probably not the failure rate odds but a 1% failure rate is several thousand times higher than what NASA would consider an abort risk condition.

        Let’s say that it’s only 0.01% risk, that’s still several thousand crashes per year. Even if we could guarantee that all of them would be non-fatal and would not involve any bystanders such as pedestrians the cost of replacing all of those vehicles every time they crashed plus fixing damage of things they crashed into, lamp posts, shop Windows etc would be so high as it would exceed any benefit to the technology.

        It wouldn’t be as bad if this was prototype technology that was constantly improving, but Tesla has made it very clear they’re never going to add lidar scanners so is literally never going to get any better it’s always going to be this bad.

        • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          …is literally never going to get any better it’s always going to be this bad.

          Hey now! That’s unfair. It is constantly changing. Software updates introduce new reversions all the time. So it will be this bad, or significantly worse, and you won’t know which until it tries to kill you in new and unexpected ways :j

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the US is an insane country where you can straight up just break the law and as long as you’re rich enough you don’t even get a slap on the wrist. If some small startup had done the same thing they’d have been shut down.

      What I don’t get is why teslas aren’t banned all over the world for being so fundamentally unsafe.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I don’t get is why teslas aren’t banned all over the world for being so fundamentally unsafe.

        I’ve argued this point the past year, there are obvious safety problems with Tesla, even without considering FSD.
        Like blinker on the steering wheel, manual door handles that are hard to find in emergencies, and distractions from common operations being behind menus on the screen, instead of having directly accessible buttons. With auto pilot they also tend to break for no reason, even on autobahn with clear road ahead! Which can also create dangerous situations.

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anything outside of a freshly painted and paved LA roads at high noon while it’s sunny isn’t ready for self drivings it seems

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tunnels are extra dangerous. Not because of the likelihood of an accident, but because of the situation if an accident happens. It blocks the tunnels easily, fills it with smoke, and kills hundreds.

        Except newly built tunnels in rich countries.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use autopilot all the time on my boat. No way in hell I’d trust it in a car. They all occasionally get suicidal. Mine likes to lull you into a sense of false security, then take a sharp turn into a channel marker or cargo ship at the last second.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. My car doesn’t have AP, but it does have a shed load of sensors and sometimes it just freaks out about stuff being too close to car for no discernible reason. Really freaks me out as I’m like what you see bro we just driving down the motorway.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        For mine, it’s the radar seeing the retro-reflective stripes on utility poles being brighter than it expects.

    • moving to lemme.zip. @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have auto pilot on boats? I never even thought about that existing. Makes sense, just never heard of it until just now!

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve technically had autopilots for over a century, the first one was the oil tanker J.A Moffett in 1920. Though the main purpose of it is to keep the vessel going dead straight as otherwise wind and currents turn it, so using modern car terms I think it would be more accurate to say they have lane assist? Commercial ones can often do waypoint navigation, following a set route on a map, but I don’t think that’s very common on personal vessels.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re probably right about the future, but like damn, I wish they would slow their roll and use LiDAR

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Elon Musk decided they absolutely would not use lidar, years ago when lidar was expensive enough that a decision like that made economic sense to at least try making work. Nowadays lidar is a lot cheaper but for whatever reason Musk has drawn a line in the sand and refuses to back down on it.

        Unlike many people online these days I don’t believe that Musk is some kind of sheer-luck bought-his-way-into-success grifter, he has been genuinely involved in many of the decisions that made his companies grow. But this is one of the downsides of that (Cybertruck is another). He’s forced through ideas that turned out to be amazing, but he’s also forced through ideas that sucked. He seems to be increasingly having trouble distinguishing them.

        • LadyAutumn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          He really hasn’t. He purchased companies that were already sitting on profitable ideas. He is not an engineer. He is not a scientist. He has no training in any design discipline. He takes credit for the ideas of people he pays. He takes credit for the previous achievements of companies he’s purchased.

          What is it going to fucking take for people to finally actually see the grifter for what he is? He’s never had a single good fucking r&d idea in his life 🙃 he has wasted billions of dollars researching and developing absolutely useless ideas that have benefited literally no one and have not made him any money. It is absolutely incredible how powerful his mythos is, that people still believe him to be or have been some kind of engineer or something. He’s a fucking racist nepo baby. He’s never done a single useful thing in his life. He wasn’t the sole individual involved in creating PayPal (and was entirely unrelated in turning it into the successful business it became), he didnt found tesla nor is he responsible for any of the technological developments it made (except for forcing his shitty charger design that notoriously breaks down and charges at half the speed that competitors do), he did not found SpaceX and by all metrics involved has been loathed by everyone at the company for the past decade for continuously committing workers rights violations and fostering a racist sexist and ableist work environment. The man has done nothing but waste people’s time stoking his ego and sexually abusing a slew of employees for the past 2 and a half decades.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Musk has drawn a line in the sand and refuses to back down on it.

          From what I heard the upcoming Tesla robotaxi test cars based on model Y are supposed to have LIDAR. But it’s ONLY the robotaxi version that has it.

          He seems to be increasingly having trouble distinguishing them.

          Absolutely, seems to me he has been delusional for years, and it’s getting worse.

  • sickofit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    This represents the danger of expecting driver override to avoid accidents. If the driver has to be prepared enough to take control in an accident like this AT ALL TIMES, then the driver is required to be more engaged then they would be if they were just driving manually, because they have to be constantly anticipating not just what other hazards (drivers, pedestrians,…) might be doing, they have to be anticipating in what ways their own vehicle may be trying to kill them.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely.

      I’ve got a car with level 2 automation, and after using it for a few months, I can say that it works really well, but you still need to be engaged to drive the car.

      What it is good at… Maintaining lanes, even in tricky situation with poor paint/markings. Maintaining speed and distance from the car in front of you.

      What it is not good at… Tricky traffic, congestion, or sudden stops. Lang changes. Accounting for cars coming up behind you. Avoiding road hazards.

      I use it mostly like an autopilot. The car takes some of the monotonous workload out of driving, which allows me to move my focus from driving the car to observing traffic, other drivers, and road conditions.

  • LadyAutumn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am never getting into a self driving car. I don’t understand why we are investing money into this technology when people can already drive cars on their own, and we should be moving towards robust public transportation systems anyway. A waste of time and resources to… what exactly? Stare at your phone for a few extra minutes a day? Work from home and every city having robust electric transit systems is what the future is supposed to be.

    • underline960@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back when I still believed, I was excited because I wanted get in my car and take a 90-minute nap until I arrived at work.

      With public transportation, you can only be half-asleep or you’ll miss your stop.

      • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used to dream of watching a movie then falling asleep in bed while my car drove the 8 hours to my folks’ house.

        But I’d want that beast to be bristling with sensors of every kind. None of this “cameras only” idiocy.

        Someday. Maybe.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a 45 minute high speed train commute to a busy end-of-line station. I can sleep, read, work, or just stare out the window and think.

        Same commute is probably twice as long by car during rush hour.

      • LadyAutumn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general I am opposed to machines being in direct control of weapons. I am also definitely of the opinion that there are lots of people who shouldn’t be driving.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ditto! They were about 1 foot from hitting the tree head on rather than glancing off, could have easily been fatal. Weirdly small axises of random chance that the world spins on

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still don’t understand what made it happen. I kept watching shadows and expecting it to happen earlier.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s some difference in the fences on the left side at the exact time the car passed by on the other lane. My guess is that the timing of the other car made the software interpret those changes in the input as something moving instead of simply something being different.

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought it might be following the tire tracks but no. It just decided to veer completely off.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have visions of Elon sitting in his lair, stroking his cat, and using his laptop to cause this crash. /s

  • atmorous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    For no reason?

    They are running proprietary software in the car that people don’t even know what is happening in background of. Every electric car needs to be turned into an open source car so that the car cannot be tampered with, no surveillancing, etc etc

    Everyone should advocate for that because the alternative is this with Tesla. And I know nobody wants this happening to other car manufacturers cars as well

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why someone will be a passenger in self-driving vehicle? They know that they are a test subjects, part of a “Cartrial” (or whatever should be called)? Self-Driving is not reliable and not necessery. Too much money is invested in something that is “Low priority to have”. There are prefectly fast and saf self-driving solutions like High-speed Trains.