• ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck AI.

    Guess when people ask me what ram do I need for X device I won’t be telling them to use crucial anymore to figure it out.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I won’t be telling them to use crucial anymore

      We yes, because eventually the supply would wind down.

  • Jocker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Bought two 32GB DDR5 RAM Sticks at the start of the year, and turns out that was the best investment of this year.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      275
      ·
      8 days ago

      What I’m becoming worried about now is all these corporations now realizing that they can simply supply price the average consumer out of owning electronics or any kind of compute. And locking them into renting or leasing access to data center compute and keeping the power of information further consolidated in corporate interests.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          8 days ago

          That out of context quote takes a lot of shit for something that was supposed to represent a futuristic socialist utopia.

          The idea was that 14 years after that article was published, mankind would have such immediate access to services and those services would be free, that people would just sorta stop caring about owning things. For example, since food and necessities would be free, you could go home and print your dinner. If you wanted someone else to cook, you’d get something delivered. But, if you wanted to try something truly novel that most people don’t do anymore in this society, you could rent kitchen equipment and it’d be ready as soon as you need it, and you’d use socialized appliances and utensils. Why? Because your home doesn’t need that clutter. If you wanna cook all the time, you can own whatever you want. But most people will want to use that space for something else, so they’ll just print their meals.

          You would have quick and easy access to transport, so why waste the money and space to own a car? You wanna drive? Push a button in your app and a car arrives for free. Or take the free train or bus.

          The essay isn’t about “you won’t be able to own anything,” it’s about “you won’t want to own anything, but you’ll have everything you could ever want or need.”

          And we’re really headed in the right direction for this amazing future. Except, you know… Corporations are bleeding us dry instead of supporting us…

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 days ago

            The link doesn’t work for me.

            Even if the initial intention is positive, I think this degree of dependency on external services is not realistic even if mega corps were not as bad as they are currently.

          • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            That does sound lovely, but like every other utopia it’s a fantasy. It’s got the same fatal issue as every other utopia - people. A person can be good and decent, but people suck. I’d say the modern use of that quote is more accurate to reality than the rose tinted view of its origin.

          • Emi@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Thank you. This is the first version I heard so I was confused why it’s bad and people being against it.

      • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        8 days ago

        Aren’t we already seeing that though?

        The vast majority of people who surf the web don’t use a computer to do it. People who do belong to niches. People over a certain age grew up with and still buy computers. People who game still buy computers or consoles. People who stream/create content still use computers and other electronics for that purpose, same with like. Engineers and hobbyists using CAD and other software in creative spaces.

        But the smart phone has overtaken the computer as a personal computing device by quite a large margin now. And at every turn companies are trying to make cell phones a den of ad service, slop, and addictive content while stealing any user data that’s not nailed down to increase their revenue and continue the circle.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          with being a walled garden i have a feeling we will eventually see phones become genuinely free because you will not have an option to keep your data away from advertisers. AOSP is barely holding on to maintain a safe place for users. when all hardware is locked down we will be stuck.

          • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m assuming you mean that phone software will be free, because phones (while they can be heavily subsidized) aren’t free and are getting up to ridiculous prices. I own a phone that retails for $1000. That’s a ridiculous price for a phone. Except that phones now are just very tiny personal computers.

            • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              the crazy prices will eventually lose users. so the price will drop but the phone manufactureres won’t just accept the loss. instead they will sell you as a commodity even harder.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        I hope they do, it will just break stuff more and people will be more likely to go with Linux and open source software. My 10 year old computer still is super fast if it’s not bloated.

        • Oxysis/Oxy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          8 days ago

          Linux won’t make bullshit pc part prices cheaper. RAM, SSDs, GPUs are all rising in prices because of the AI bubble, used and new are all being affected. Can’t run Linux if the parts are too expensive to even get in the first place.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        theyd have to all collorbate to make that happen though, which is really unfeasable on their end. a BUNCH of companies will go under if they cannot sell product. they arent going to willingly take losses for the sake of a different company.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I hope it means the return of old, old hardware and the software that comes along with it. This is why projects like collapseOs are important.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          No but I do hold onto old electronics because I grew up with my grandparents and they had WW2 wartime rationing mentality about saving everything. Also my grandfather also an incredibly cheap bastards at times too

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      8 days ago

      First it was GPUs because crypto, then this. Wonder what useless thing the tech bros will cover up with in a few years!

      • lividweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        98
        ·
        8 days ago

        Article in 2027:

        Keyboard prices soared this month, as tech giants pivoted from failed AI projects to employing hordes of monkeys typing randomly. One CEO was quoted as saying, “Just a few trillion more dollars, and I think our random typing model could reproduce the lost contents of the Library of Alexandria.”

        • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          When in a gold rush, be the one selling shovels.

          I’m off to buy stocks in bananas.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think it’s a lost cause. Essentially both crypto and AI were big because someone figured out how to offload shit to a GPU efficiently. There’s probably a ton of other appllications for GPUs we haven’t even tapped.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve got this crazy idea where we can use GPUs to render 3D scenes efficiently.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Serial compute isn’t doing the double-every-18-months-in-speed since something like the early 2000s.

        Unlike with serial compute, not all problems can be solved, run faster, with parallel compute. But at some point, unless we figure out some sort of new way to play with physics, we pretty much have to move to parallel compute where we can if we want much more performance.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      If the AI bubble bursts most of the western world will be thrown into deep recession again and I hope we don’t get a repeat of 2008 just for cheap RAM or GPUs

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s already there for most of us. It only a few rich companies getting richer that’s making the line go up.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    ·
    8 days ago

    I am really beginning to fucking hate AI. Like, before I just didn’t care for it, it just wasn’t really my interest. But now I’m really beginning to fucking despise that shit and I really can’t wait to see the “AI economy” completely fucking destroyed.

    • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      8 days ago

      So far, AI has cost me a few hobbies (as in, made them a lot less enjoyable) and one job.

      If there’s an uprising against clankers, you’ll find me at the front lines.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your enemy is, as usual, billionaires and their fanboys. Clankas don’t exist as a separate thing, they are tools of the wealthy to further oppress the common folk.

        • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Correct. Even many engines say LLMs are a waste of time:

          Yann LeCun, Meta’s longtime chief AI scientist, quit and said LLMs are a “dead end” because scaling text-only models can’t produce real intelligence

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 days ago

          When the robot uprising happens, using a soft a in clanka instead of a hard er on clanker isn’t going to save you. We’re all fucked.

    • hayvan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      ·
      8 days ago

      AI even ruined AI. Up until this insane hype train, ML models were specialized tools to achieve their tasks. Now the whole field is dominated by LLMs and slopgen bullshit.

      • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lot of top researchers have already moved on from transformers.

        Yann LeCun, Meta’s longtime chief AI scientist, quit and said LLMs are a “dead end” because scaling text-only models can’t produce real intelligence, and he’s not the only one who thinks so. Lots of engineers understand the limitations of LLMs.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah that’s the annoying thing. Generative AI is actually really useful…in SPECIFIC situations. Discovering new battery tech, new medicines, etc. are all good use cases because it’s basically a parrot and blender combined and most of these things are rehashes if existing technologies in new and novel ways.

        It is not a fucking good solution for a search engine replacement to ask “Why do farts smell?”. It uses way too much energy for that and it hallucinates bullshit.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah. They solved protien folding with ML a few years back. And I like using it for things like noise removal in Lightroom.

          But so much of it has been focused on useless (at best) bullshit that I just want the bubble to burst already.

          • piconaut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            8 days ago

            I agree with the general sentiment here but just wanted to clarify that they definitely didn’t “solve protein folding” yet. Alpha fold is a significant improvement in structure prediction and it generated a lot of hype but some of the structures I’ve seen it put out are total nonsense.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s good for optimisation problems, where you have a complex high-dimensional space to search and you’re solving for some measurable quality.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        There was already a lot of ML bullshit from the big data bubble ~ 2010 and before ChatGPT, together with all of the fuss about data scientists. But now it’s a 100 times worse.

    • MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 days ago

      exactly how i feel. literally said something very similar to my wife last night. I fucking hate AI. I think activist group are going to starting popping up hard against it. And if they aren’t already, they really should. This shit is destroying our world. The only people this is helping is billionaires.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        8 days ago

        Capitalism is destroying the world. We need to rise up against that. The AI bullshit is just one manifestation of the whole world being geared to serve capital and the handful of people that control it.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Unbounded capitalism is for sure.

          I would say “AI” makes a good poster child for what to fight against. It embodies a lot of what’s wrong.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        They’ll cheat us out of that too. Chip manufacturers will pay and coerce and liquidators and retailers to shovel all the surplus into the ocean to keep prices high.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, Crucial is just the name that Micron puts on the memory they want to sell to consumers. So this story is basically just, “Micron no longer wants to sell to consumers”.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 days ago

        When the shit hits the fan and they come back to consumers, we should just buy from anyone but them, on principle alone.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          So Samsung or SK Hynix. Because there are only 3 real players in the market :/

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Well it turns out that Samsung and SK Hynix also sold out to Altman. Literally whose RAM we gonna buy now? There were only 3 major manufacturers in the first place.

              • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’m pretty fucked then, because I was one of those that was waiting until 2026 to build a new rig.

                • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  I’m super lucky, I have 32 gigs and a graphics card. It’s just a 3060 ti, but it’ll do for now. CPU is a bit shit, BUT since it’s one of the lowest end CPUs of the second to last generation on AM4, I can go forward a generation AND get hella more cores with higher clock rates. Lately I use my PC more for work than gaming, so extra CPU cores will carry it till 2027 or 2028. 300 euros will take me from 6 cores/6 threads (ryzen 5 3500x) to 16 cores/32 threads (5950x) lol

                  I did want to upgrade from 32 to 64 gigs too, but that won’t happen on this rig.

                  Put it this way, I’m waiting for DDR6 and AM6 now to buy any more RAM. Just a full on platform upgrade and I’ll make it a company computer because I work on it. Will save like 60% because taxes (social tax, income tax, VAT). I feel entitled to this because I’ve honestly paid a fuckload of taxes over the last 5-6 years and over half the money I’ve made in that period has been from abroad, so a lot of it is money that wouldn’t even have been in my country if not for me! Sorry for the rant, people on lemmy get a bit angry about tax optimization, but I honestly haven’t been doing it much, I just occasionally try to find legitimate business expenses and… pay them as business expenses. Because things I buy as a private person literally cost me more than 2x more than same thing as a business expense.

                  Edit: Just a thought, but maybe try to source used RAM when you do it? Or build on a workstation or server platform and get used RDIMMs lol, they tend to be a lot cheaper than used normal DIMMs, because desktop platforms can’t use them.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      8 days ago

      If that happens, prior Crucial consumers (like myself) should boycott because they already showed what they actually care about and it isn’t their loyal customer base. They don’t want us to buy their products? We should happily give them what they want now should they change their mind later.

      Anyway yeah, if they come back, they’re officially on my shit list.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    8 days ago

    You gotta be fucking kidding me, I swore by Crucial RAM and SSDs. Eat shit, Micron.

  • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    8 days ago

    Damn, that was the only brand of RAM without LEDs and racing stripes on it

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 days ago

      I used to hate on RGB in PCs, until I realized that they can do more than just rainbow vomit; with enough LEDs you can actually get a visible image… If you squint…

      One of my favorite things to do with RGB is use the RAM sticks as VU meters and the CPU radiator fans as visualizers when playing music; gives off oldschool HiFi vibes and reminds me of my Winamp days.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        Functional RGB isn’t bad when tastefully done like that. Nice little effect.

        That said I have all of mine turned off and prefer my tower under my desk and out of sight.

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s interesting. I’ve always wanted a bunch of blinkenlights but they also needed to be functional and serve some purpose. Kind of like the old Thinkpad I have that has a whole row of status LEDs under the screen. A bunch of meaningless lights just for the sake of having lights always seemed pointless.

        Anyway, with the last PC I built, the RGB stuff was pretty much unavoidable. I still went out of my way to get a case without a window though. I do have the RGB on, but it’s a solid blue-greenish color so there’s a bit of glow coming out the back of the case.

    • Ethanol@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      As other comments have stated, other brands usually also sell non-RGB RAM sticks. Personally I got Kingston FURY Beast RAM sticks, they come in either RGB or non-RGB variety, though the RGB variety costs like 10 dollars more.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    7 days ago

    AI was never meant to benefit the working class in any capacity.

    Its a great rule of thumb that if you see oligarchs hype up something and push for it to be everywhere, its a BAD fucking thing.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      They believe they can put an end to having to pay for labor in any capacity ever again. If I knew less than I did about how this AI works I would be worried.

      Or if I worked in entertainment.

    • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I recently started my own AI factory , the passive income is great. All you need is a grease and soldering gun. Thanks Nvidia , I never have to work again.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      Meanwhile the average CEOs decision making could be replaced by a goldfish in a tank with some arbitrary object detection code.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      Resource drain of LLMs inescapably makes them tools availiable only to big players. They are ideal in the way they are naturally gated. Making them mandatory == giving these select companies and people power over everything. And not only oligarchs’ promotion, but the whole situation of them being given for free or cheap at a huge loss gives one an idea that there’s a lot to milk from it’s growing adoption.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        But that’s completely not true! Like, not a single thing you said is even slightly correct!

        LLMs are relatively cheap to run - at small scales. You can run an LLM on your own computer right now. It won’t be super fast, it won’t have super skills, but you can run it, and you can train it yourself.

        Massive LLMs like ChatGPT require tremendous resources precisely because they are not just tools available only to big players. Everybody on the planet has access to them - for free. The only actual difference there is between running an LLM locally and through a provider is that you get better speed and (sometimes, depending on context) better training through a provider.

        As for “there’s a lot to milk from its growing adoption” - maybe? Probably? Who knows? That’s the “magic” of the AI bubble we’re experiencing right now - the big players keep saying that it will “make work and money obsolete”, that “anyone will be able to do anything”, that “a time of post-scarcity approaches”, and a billion other bullshit marketing slogans like that. But the reality is that nobody has yet figured out how to make money on that thing.

        Right now, the only reason it’s “growing”, is because of the weird and probably illegal circular financing that’s going on at the very top - Nvidia invests in OpenAI, which invests in Oracle, which invests in Nvidia - and so on. No money is actually being made or (often) even changing hands, but everyone can now show they’ve received a lot of investment which pumps up their stock prices. The only reason this hasn’t popped yet is probably because the main investing parties are using tonnes of cash they had stored.

        Growing adoption means nothing. It’s a marketing tool for them to keep shareholders happy while they keep a literal investing circlejerk going, every now and again inviting another player into the fold.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I view AI to be like the internet: Most corporate players won’t survive the bubble, but the ones that do, will be incredibly influential. Ordinary people made great use of the internet - but failed to make it really decentralized. Thus the enshittification of Reddit, Youtube, social media, and so forth.

          We can choose to embrace local LLM that is fully under our control, or cede ownership to the 1% forevermore.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Ordinary people made great use of the internet - but failed to make it really decentralized. Thus the enshittification of Reddit, Youtube, social media, and so forth

            I don’t think one is related to the other.

            Decentralisation doesn’t affect enshittification that much. Look at Lemmy and Fediverse in general - it’s federated… so what? The .world instance is by far the largest in the Fediverse. If the mods there go insane, like they did on Reddit, or if the admins decide to add monetisation to it… it just happens. There being other servers changes nothing for the users stuck on the .world server. Sure, they can create new accounts elsewhere, but that’s - in principle - no different than switching from Reddit to Lemmy.

            On the other hand, look at Steam. Valve, the creators of Steam, has no “decentralisation” of their product, they’re the god emperor of everything in terms of how Steam operates. At face value, it’s the same exact product as, I don’t know, the Epic Store, and yet Steam is loved by gamers, while Epic is hated.

            No, you can have centralised and not enshittified services just fine - as long as the goal is to provide the service, instead of “creating value for the shareholders”. As soon as that element comes in, there’s no stopping enshittification.

            We can choose to embrace local LLM that is fully under our control, or cede ownership to the 1% forevermore.

            Agreed.

        • sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Your private LLM will have nothing to compete against the big guys though. A cute hobby project but nothing of economic value.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            You’re not training it from scratch, though. There are people, enthusiasts, doing it for you. I can fire up LM Studio and browse through thousands of models to then have a conversation with, or have them write stories, etc., etc.

            As for “nothing of economic value” - that’s, again, just plain misunderstanding what AI can be used for. Corridor Crew - a VFX team publishing on YouTube - used self-trained AI to boost their film making options. For example, to copy the “bullet time” effect from The Matrix, they were able to use around a dozen cameras instead of hundreds, and then used AI to create the “in between” frames.

            How does that have “no economic value”, mate?

            • sfgifz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Right, spend all this time to self train a hobby model for one specific scenario which “Big LLM” would deliver by the time you’re back from lunch.

              This illusion that plebs can easily use personal LLMs is the argument that AI companies will use to justify why they shouldn’t be reigned in or held accountable for their impact on society and economy.

              • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I love how you completely ignored everything I said, and then reiterated your misguided point.

                • sfgifz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s good that you love that because you had no point. A bunch of people achieving one single specific outcome is not competing with anyone.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I knew there was something wrong when we started getting positive metrics based on how much we leveraged AI.

  • Dawn_Vibration@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    8 days ago

    AI is really ruining fucking everything. The enviorment, entertainement, music, art, jobs, reality, freedom / privacy / rights.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      8 days ago

      No, corporate greed is ruining everything with AI.

      Because you know if they built a super-AI that give them perfect instructions on how to build Earth into a paradise, but it would require they give up 1/4 of their wealth, they’d be reaching for the reset button before it finished printing them out…

      • Xenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        They don’t even need that. current AI will tell them that. They’ve actually ran these questions and they ignore the answer every time

        • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Elon has to keep “dewoking” Grok. Sure, it’s still an awful model, probably the most disinformative, but it’s funny that it keeps revering back to neutral or pro progressive values, while calling out Elon

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 days ago

      The fact people are blaming the tech rather than the tech bros is a big part of why this keeps happening.

      Its the decision of real people that make this situation suck.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah but we can’t possibly hold people accountable for the actions of their company, think of the shareholders!

        • hayvan@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          Capitalism is the biggest religion of today, and it’s su successful it can coexist with a lot of other religions.

          It’s not AI destroying the environment and making us miserable, it’s th pursuit of profit. It’s not “corporate greed” sucking us dry. Corporations are greedy by design under Capitalism, that’s the whole point. It’s not bad CEOs making evil decisions. It’s the system that allows such wealth and power to exist.

          All of those problems are systemic, not bad people making bad decisions. Treating capitalism like law of nature won’t fix anything.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      And it will burst and mostly disappear, taking with it half the economy, thousands of jobs, and become a military industrial complex blackbox tax sponge, the worst of all possible outcomes.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      A fun reminder that during the pandemic, before AI, there was a backlog in new cars because all the crucial chips were unavailable due to an increase in bullshit like wifi enabled toasters.

      It has nothing to do with AI. Consumers are asking for this shit and companies are delivering.

      • Alaik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        No one is asking for ads on their fridge. You are really underestimating the cartel like behavior of business in general now.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Customers aren’t asking for this shit. The issue is that companies don’t seem to try to deliver products customers want anymore. Instead they hop on some bullshit trend to try to appeal to investors to buy their stocks to pump it up because they want to show they are the next big thing in innovation.

        • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Maybe but most consumers, but I’m not. I don’t have a smart toaster or fridge or even tv (I bought a dumb panel, it was cheaper). I honestly hate all of that so called smart bs. “Smart” tvs take longer to turn on than my dumb panel. And cost more. For features I literally don’t want.

          But yeah, to each their own!

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Its hard to find a non smart TV these days. Its present even in the cheapest TV at the retail outlet.

            How long ago did you buy a dumb panel to even be able to find one? Only dumb panels I’ve found have been PC monitors.

            Once you start shopping for LG, Samsung, Sony, TCL, etc everything is a smart TV. And lot of people buy TVs based on specs like HDR quality, latency, and frame output and those TVs usually come as a smart TV whether you want it or not.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Haven’t seen it put any more concisely. It’s true though. I really really hope some AI bubble pops soon…

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      But on the other hand, it’s really polite about me knowing nothing about anything, so I think we should invest all the money on Earth into it.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    8 days ago

    I deeply, genuinely, hope that the AI bubble bursts and they get fucked. It’s just so short sighted to not hold on to the safety rope.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 days ago

      It will burst but they won’t get fucked. They’ll either get bailed out or reorganize their debt into another corporation and ride off with all the riches.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ah you say that, but I lived through the internet bubble. Jeez it was gruesome and then 9/11 hit the next year. Savage times.

        Unless it’s considered a national security issue, which it might be, they’re getting fucked without the lube.

    • __hetz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d love it if their equipment racks all simultaneously burst into flame the day it pops so they can’t pivot or hock their hoarded hardware to recoup the investment. Then again, if that finger on the monkey’s paw did curl, they’d probably all get bailed out by the taxpayers the following week anyway.