• OutForARip@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        106
        ·
        3 months ago

        These boys died from an unnecessary procedure that should never have been performed on a child who cannot consent. Keep your child abuse out of it.

          • OutForARip@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            54
            ·
            3 months ago

            Culture does not excuse child abuse. If they truly want to go through with this, let them do so as adults with minds that are fully developed.

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                24
                ·
                3 months ago

                People not from my culture can abuse children.

                They can even, if they’re very very creative/completionist or maybe in a different climate, abuse them in a way the culture I’m from didn’t. Reactionary fetishization of indigeneity is only very slightly better than instinctive condemnation of a thing because it’s unlike you.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                If this were about “looking out for their children’s well-being,” then wouldn’t they follow the suggestions of doctors and specialists in the field of pediatrics?

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                The cultural institution of pederasty practiced by the noble terf islander civilizations serves to impart a certain stoicism and strength of character to their future leaders. Its a valid cultural practice, and just because you don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

                That’s what you sound like.

          • forrgott@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            ·
            3 months ago

            The “procedure” you’re referring to is, by definition, genital mutilation. Which is intentionally inflicting trauma on a child. That is child abuse.

            If they were truly able to consent (which is not possible due to power imbalance), then maybe you’d have an argument. Maybe. But the truth is this “procedure” is for the express purpose of forcing puritanical beliefs and lifestyle into another. So, again, its literally child abuse.

            Believing that your religious views override any of this? That’s bigotry.

              • Sunshine@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                23
                ·
                3 months ago

                Your “cultural practices” ends when it harms another sentient being. Funny how you also want to harm the animals for selfish reasons by pushing misinformation on the plant-based diet to make excuses to eat the flesh and secretions of others.

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I think fetishizing and othering foreign cultures, suggesting they’re incapable of modern hygeine standards, etc,is also pretty fucking bigoted.

          • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            3 months ago

            It is child abuse. You only do it because it’s always been done before. That’s what cultural means. You have No reason, other than, we’ve always done it, so we can never rethink it. That’s what you’re saying. Never question the reason. Don’t think about if it’s right or wrong, it’s “cultural” therefore we just do it blindly without questioning. And you, the person acting blindly, following cruel practices, just because they’ve always been done, thinks you’re in the right, and everyone who can think for themselves and question things, is just wrong. You know that’s delusional, right.

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The culture I’m from is mostly fucked up shit.

            Just because it’s traditional does not mean it isn’t fucked up shit. Could I be wrong because I don’t know the context? Totally! But melanin is just color, not inherent fucking virtue. Don’t fetishize other cultures. They could suck as much as yours.

              • SourGumGum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                3 months ago

                The foreskin/glans is self cleaning, if it was this big hazard to our health and safety it would not have evolved.

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                many cultural practices have practical origins

                Yeah. I remember some of the ones practiced on me.

                The practical origins were things like control, degradation, fear. Practical purposes are not always valid or good. Some cultures are fucked up and if everything about them burned it would be an acceptable sacrifice for the amount of bullshit we’re getting rid of.

                early childhood infections

                Okay. But Europe and Asia don’t do this, don’t have a long tradition of this. Do surrounding cultural groups?

                What infections? Infections are well within the realm of academia, we study the shit out of infections, and with cis dudes doing most of the science finding, I think dick infections their causes and their remedies is something I would expect a flood of academic material on.

                look down on

                I don’t assume they’re less than half as depraved tyrannical and shitty as the dumpster fire I fell out of. Sometimes I’m surprised, sometimes I’m not.

                common sense

                Okay but is it? A few of the women in my family, extremely high genetic cancer risk, removed a breast at the drop of a hat, like first hint radical mastectomy being planned instead of any tests, no attempt to save anything. I, not being an insane reactionary defined by a childish trauma response and kind of liking my breasts¹ might take a more measured approach. I can’t help but think these kids, these literal children, are not sufficiently informed for these decisions to be made with the amount of cultural inertia behind them.

                ¹and having anything to lose

          • PsycyTuna@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 months ago

            I get that it’s hard for you to call if for what it is, but it is genital mutilation. There’s zero need for it. They can’t consent to it.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you define your cultural identity by the need to unnecessarily mutilate the genitals of children, then your culture is shit and does not deserve respect or acceptance.

            Take a step back and consider what it is you’re defending here.

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                No. The bigotry would be not applying that logic across the board; doing it ICC style.

                You are engaging in a brand of ‘bebevolent’ fetishization of ‘barbaric’ peoples and othering them, applying different values to them than to yourself. This is bigotry, even if it’s not hateful. Its genuinely disgusting.

                I can imagine someone like you defending some of the things that my culture of origin did to me as a child this same way, and I’m white, so you wouldn’t; you’d apply values to me like I’m an actual person, but imagining someone who did? I’d fucking kill them

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Its a cultural institution to rape children in TERF islander private schools.

            Tell me why this is different, admit you’re a disingenuous lying fuck defending sick shit for made up dogmatic reasons you have no understanding of, or admit you’re a pedophile.

            • Insekticus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              3 months ago

              The comment you’re replying to has got to be a bot. Like, wtf? What kind of sick individual calls it derogatory to say, “Hey, let’s not mutilate childrens’ genitals.”

              Tell me youre a fucked up psychopath with telling me.

                • Insekticus@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What the actual fuck does being a white supremacist have to do with male genitals mutilation?

                  Let’s put it this way. If your cultural, religious, or ideological leanings require you to cut off foreskins or clitoral hoods off unconsenting children, youre a sick fuck.

                  If you dont have those cultural, religious, or ideological leanings, and you just enjoy watching children get mutilated, youre a sick fuck.

                  White supremacists and child circumcision enthusiasts such as yourself are all sick fucks.

              • recursivethinking@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                It is not derogatory. The word means:

                “… or disfigure, especially by cutting off tissue or body parts.”

                from Latin mutilātus (past participle of mutilāre “to cut off, maim”)

          • Ach@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            3 months ago

            There is zero biological reason to remove foreskin. It’s objectively mutilation.

            I’m circumsized. I did not give anyone permission to remove a part of my penis that was perfectly healthy when I was an infant and could not consent. I want you to quantify to me how I was not done wrong, and how my bodily autonomy was not violated. I understand that isn’t the case in the article, but it’s the perfect example for you to argue.

            Also, just because a culture or religion does something doesn’t mean I have to support it, and it definitely doesn’t make me a bigot to oppose it. Iran will stone women to death under Sharia Law. Am I a bigot for saying stoning women is bad?

            • Zetta@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              3 months ago

              Infant genital mutilation is disgusting and I think it’s about time it’s made illegal around the world. I’m sorry about your penis.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            3 months ago

            As someone who is perfectly comfortable with his circumcized penis: it’s absolutely mutilation.

            • fishy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              3 months ago

              Agreed. My parents had me snipped. When I asked why it was basically “well everyone was doing it.”

              My son is intact and can make his own decision about it when he’s older.

      • forrgott@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 months ago

        So, not mutilating kids’ genitals is…bigotry???

        Fuck no. Like, seriously, your position is factually incorrect. And, frankly, the tone of superiority makes you sound, well, like a fucking bigot.

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is not doing things to children’s (or anyone’s) bodies without their consent (which they may not be capable of, depending on what for) is a cost? Like, if you were designing a society, would the ‘stuff done to the bodies of children (or fucking anyone) without their consent’ number be one you’re proud of making smaller?

              • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Did the kid want their ear pierced, with decent understanding of the cultural weight that’s pushing them?

                Or is it only allowed because it’s the thing that their parents did? Could the kid as easily get a genital piercing? Full back tattoo of Richard Nixon’s face? Cool face scar?

                • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  One could argue that alfeeling that ear mutilations is ok is a cultural thing. Many very young children have their ears pieced, and probably more than half of girls get their ears pierced before they are at the age of consent.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            What does the term “mutilation” actually mean in your mind?

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        All unnessecary child genital mutilation is fucked up, even when done in the USA or any other country, whether for religious or parental choice reasons. The only appropriate circumcision is for direct medical intervention or by the informed consent of the gentals’ owner.

        • gramie@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Please ceremonies are usually performed on older adolescent or young adult males. It marks the change from child to adulthood.

          Not that I’m in favor of it in any case, but it’s not being done on infants, like in North America.

          • Sunshine@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            3 months ago

            Here we go with the intentional misunderstanding. Stop mutilating the private parts of infants.

          • Rhoeri@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Unnecessary procedures to mutilate the body are morally and ethically wrong regardless of the age of the patient.

            For fucks sake. How on earth can you be in defense of this abuse? Please, explain why you support this.

              • Rhoeri@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ears are predominantly pierced when age of consent is reached and no place will do it without that consent.

                Parents doing this to their children without consent- are abusing their children.

                So in a way, yeah- like ears being pierced.

                Additionally, pieced ears heal back if left alone. Circumcision is permanent mutilation.

                Man I love blowing up false equivalency fallacies! Thanks for this!

                • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Not from what I’ve seen in n America - most girls under 16 already have their ears pierced. And such ear mutilation of girls without their ability to consent seems to be culturally fine.
                  Of course the two situations aren’t identical, that’s how analogies work and it’s still a useful part of critical thinking.
                  The point is that it’s not quite as black and white as many people think. If these boys at 16 want their diicks cut and it’s part of their culture and done properly, I’m not going to say it’s bad. Obviously in the case of this article, it was not done right. Circumcision just after birth is a separate issue; but I’m not particularly against it having had it done to me and not feeling that I am lacking anything as a result.

          • Sunshine@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            The doctor forces down vuvloplasty and calls the baby a girl because people are afraid of unique plumbing.

      • wolfeh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        Archangel1313… are you okay? Is everything good? I don’t see how not wanting people to mutilate other people’s genitals is bigotry. Or is this a disingenuous “parents’ rights” argument?

      • Rhoeri@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        So now imagine if that “ritual” never took place-

        if in said imagination, you can see that those boys would still be alive, then I’d say you’re half way there.

        You’ll be all the way there when you are able to come to this conclusion all on your own.

          • Rhoeri@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 months ago

            Imagine taking a pro-circumcision stance in the comments of an article where 41 boys died as a result of the procedure- all while fully KNOWING that in this day and age, it is a brutal and absolutely unnecessary thing to do begin with.

            Those boys would still be alive if assholes stoped butchering children’s genitalia.

            END OF DEBATE.

              • Rhoeri@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 months ago

                Now imagine if those procedures were outlawed for being barbaric and unnecessary.

                • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It would still happen, and be more dangerous. Cultural inertia would keep it happening and the requirement to keep it secret would drive it underground. Education is the way.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                True, they should have just had a rabbi use their mouth to do it while they were still an infant. Good point.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are valid reasons for parents to choose circumcision. I’m not sure religion is a part of that, and I’m not sure that it isn’t. For example, if this were female circumcision based strictly on religion or culture, I’d feel very strongly against it, since it’s to curb pleasure and often leads to infection, from bodily fluids not being able to exit. However, malformed genetalia can also cause complications.

        I’m glad I never had to choose gender assignment or not because children in middle school can be cruel, so can misassignment, and as we see, adults can be cruel too.

        I posit perhaps such complicated decisions not be based entirely on religion or cultural identity of the parents alone, since what the child chooses as an adult may be very different than what the parent prefers.

  • hexdream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    it seems a lot of commenters are missing that these are not babies. Those in the story are aged 16+ and it is a cultural rite of passage.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re still children who are physically growing, especially cognitively. Likewise, they were sent there by their parents, so let’s not pretend this was adults making a decision on their own, this was forced onto children.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        So at 16 they shouldn’t be able to choose what they do with their own dicks? How would this apply if they were trans and wanted bottom surgery? How does it apply to getting one’s ears pierced?

        • CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Trans people go through long processes and professional oversight to arrive at medical intervention in professional settings. Bottom surgery is not taken lightly in the same way that later in life circumcision should be and should be consented to. Ear piercings are largely inconsequential although I strongly disagree with piercing unwilling children.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some of the arrest were parents who lied to have it done before their children were 16+ so they were in fact 15.

      Not to trust Google entirely but it says that anyone younger than 18 is considered a child in South Africa.

      If that is the case then anyone below 18 cannot consent to sex, if they can’t consent to sex then they can’t consent to surgery or medical procedures. Their parents should not be making the choice for them, it is bodily autonomy for them to choose for themselves when they are a legal adult and not before.