• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    16 days ago

    Now that’s some cyberpunk dystopian shit. Corpos drugging up employees for productivity.

    • zeezee@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      16 days ago

      I mean that’s not new - tech companies will still advertise “coffee on tap” as a perk to work for them

    • GorGor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 days ago

      the whole idea of a coffee ‘break’ was created to pump stimulants into workers to improve productivity.

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        I think it is the unintended side effect of taking a short break which actually increases productivity.

        There are studys that show that constant coffein consumption just make being caffeinated the new normal.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Who’s actually going to use these if they’re not already a smoker / vaper? Maybe they’re just providing them so people don’t have to get up and go outside for 5-10 minutes to smoke.

  • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 days ago

    Fuck this to hell. I want tobacco to go extinct, not be more accessible.

    If there was a button that just made every tobacco plant (and the backups in that one seed vault place) die, I would keep pushing it for days just to make sure it was all gone. Including existing smoking products.

    Not sorry not sorry. Addicts all going cold turkey that day.

    • ImNotThatPokable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      As a nicotine addict, I wouldn’t advise this. Making every one of us go cold turkey in one moment will be the end of humanity. Nicotine withdrawal is no joke.

      I don’t understand your fury to be honest. It’s unhinged. So what happened to make you feel this way?

    • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      @oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip @Krauerking@lemy.lol
      @aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

      First, I don’t smoke and never had smoked (not considering the passive smoking from being close to smokers), the only “drug” I use non-frequently is alcohol (a vodka-saké beverage).

      This said, your paternalistic implied thought (“drugs are bad, people shouldn’t use drugs”; are their bodies yours, to begin with? Do you happen to have some kind of ownership over other’s bodies? Who gave you this almighty authority, do you happen to be a Demiurgal Archon of sorts?) is missing the forest for the trees.

      I’m barely knowledgeable about biology, but I know enough to remember about symbiotic relationships in nature, as well as phylogenetics. The plant responsible for tobacco wasn’t some kind of lab creation, IIRC tobacco plant even predates us homininae, and this means there are certainly species biologically interacting with the tobacco plant, perhaps species reliant of tobacco plant (not necessarily because of nicotine, but because it’s a plant which siphons nutrients and resources from the soil, displacing water and somehow contributing to water cycles).

      The moment this Archonic hubris illustrated by your text were to render tobacco extinct, unbeknownst to you, other species would be going extinct as well, and this may include humans due to how food web is so interconnected in ways we’re still trying to figure out. That’s part of why we try to classify species taxonomically and phylogenetically, because this is also valuable for us to identify potential interspecies relationships. I mean, this is exactly what phylogenetics is about: study of evolutionary relationships among biological entities.

      So, please, seek some phylogenetics and biology awareness before feeding paternalistic, bigoted anti-drug thoughts. Others bodies aren’t yours for you to wish for control, let alone other species.

      • Dale@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 days ago

        In my opinion this is splitting hairs. Chewing tobacco, cigarettes, cigars, etc., are tobacco products having tobacco as a main ingredient. Nicotine gum, pouches, patches, and ecigs are nicotine products as they have nicotine (synthetic or derived) but no actual tobacco. If the got the nicotine from eggplants you wouldn’t call it an eggplant product.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 days ago

        Almost all of it is tobacco-derived, which is why I always found the “tobacco companies are trying to get vapes banned” idea ridiculous. They’re the ones making the stuff that goes in the vapes.

        I think the point of the distinction is regarding cancer. Tobacco on the gums causes mouth cancer, nicotine maybe maybe not.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      And here’s me, reading that tech companies are feeding their employees tabasco and wondering just what that’s supposed to do.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 days ago

    Hmmm, how much you want to bet the tobacco companies slipped a little money under their door mat

    • Krauerking@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t want to lose money having to take the opposite of you. The likelihood they are actually just buying this at market price and don’t have a contract is so low it might as well be rigged.

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 days ago

    Always with the “extract every ounce of yourself for us”, never with the “take care of yourself to maximize your potential for us”.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 days ago

    Nicotine : one of the only drugs that makes you a better slave ; therefore, one of the very few legal ones.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yeah, I mean there were the amphetamines and opiates that they thought made people better workers too but that was just during periods where people hated reality and they realized the disassociation was worse for efficiency so now just back to nicotine.

      Why can’t we make our own study that says that the dopamine of watching a live hibachi chef makes us a better slave and at least get a flaming volcano of onion out of this?

  • village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I mean, tech jobs and stimulants have always gone hand in hand. My theory is that’s because the field attracts a lot of people with ADHD.

    This is functionally no different than a company providing coffee.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’m as much of a “caffeine is an addictive psychoactive drug” person as the next but nicotine is so much worse.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          Nicotine is a poison, many or most of the cardiac issues associated with smoking are due to nicotine, not the ancillary chemicals in cigarette smoke.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            No, I’ve just been vaping for about 15 years and have apparently read more studies about nicotine than the people downvoting.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            I mean I consume maybe 6-7 mg of nicotine, but probably less, per day by vaping. At 0.8mg/kg I would have to consume over 80 to reach LD50 and I believe that has to be in your blood at once.

            My caffeine intake is around 400 mg per day. LD50 is over 20 literal grams.

            Going by these numbers it does indeed sound like the nicotine is worse, but neither one is ever going to get close to the LD50. If I were to significantly increase my nicotine intake, it’d get nauseating for me pretty fast. Caffeine I could probably double without noticing a damn thing, but beyond that I think it will start affecting me too much too.

            Also that’s over a day, whereas I believe LD50 implies it’d have to be in your blood all at once?

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            No, it’s not. Or at least it’s not according to the journal articles published on the topic.

            It’s combusting plant matter that’s horrible for you.