I mean, what’s the alternative here? The Swiss government, which they are subject to, issued a legal warrant. Any email provider you want to use will be subject to warrants. All of them.
They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data. In this case they were able to provide personally identifying payment data because the person paid for their account with… a credit card. They offer crypto payment options, and would not have been able to usefully comply had the person used that method.
The alternative is literally a single sentence: “That person paid by crypto, we have no payment details on file for them.”
I get the sentiment, but no serious company is going to survive for very long lying to its government when it receives search warrants. This is not a realistic solution.
Mailfence has no idea who I am.
Tuta never got any payment info outta me, though I do use them for official things tied to my actual id… but only those things, not other things.
???
The alternative is to use an alternative.
They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data.
Fucking obviously not, this is far from the first time something like this happened.
They could, you know, design the services they offer such that they are actually incapable of complying with warrants, by design.
Payment info is the easiest, most direct way to identify a person, beyond uploading your actual government ID.
Maybe, maybe Proton should stop acting like that is not fucking obviously the case, maybe they should make it more clear that if your threat model includes, I dunno, a terroristic theocratic fascist government, their currently existing marketing is extremely misleading to tech-normies?
If you pay for mailfence with card, they know who you are.
Also, I’m pretty sure that proton do not have unencrypted email contents of their users. That’s why they can’t offer IMAP like everyone else does (you can’t connect your email client directly to proton, you need an extra app).
Also, I think that proton’s marketing is pretty in-line with what they actually offer. Protection from e.g. data breaches should be quite good and I think it’s reasonable to primarily market to people who are not directly targeted by the US government.
Who pays for mailfence?
Why would you?
I think it’s reasonable to primarily market to people who are not directly targeted by the US government.
Then you’re either an idiot or are somehow blissfully ignorant of everything related to Peter Thiel and Palantir.
helped FBIadhered to Swiss legal requirementsAre you guys expecting companies to break the laws of their own countries on your behalf?
Nah, just expecting honest, straightforward marketing.
Here’s an example:
Hey we do E2EE and shit, but if you pay us for it, and the US government gets mad at you, we’ll fuck you.
There, see?
Honest, simple.
So, from your perspective, all companies should include, in their marketing campaigns, that they wont break the law for you? lol
When their marketing is based on privacy, they need to be honest that they’re not going to be private.
I recall other companies using “canaries” to help their customers know that they had been compromised by the government but were legally not allowed to talk about it.
They’ve never had a true Warrant Canary. They have however always posted an annual Transparency Report on their blog. Where they reference they abide by Swiss Law. https://proton.me/legal/transparency
*abide
Not surprising given Proton Mail is owned by a far right Trump supporter.
Stop spreading lies and misinformation. We get enough of that shit from the fascists.
It is truth.
Andy Yen supports Trump.
Post proof then.
I’m confused, nothing there is an endorsement of a candidate and nothing in that tweet isn’t factual…
The moral of this story is to not pay for proton for email usage.
Cancelled this shit over a year ago at this point. Very glad I left. Fuck Proton.
Oh, proton caved to government warrant? ./mild shock
Idiots expect them to pay salaries while ignoring government suppeona 🤦♂️. I was screeched at on a banned account.
Boooooooo
