- cross-posted to:
- fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
You must log in or # to comment.
If lemmy had an equivilent of retweeting, I would.
The Iran war is worse than the fucking Epstein files you weirdo
I don’t disagree, but let me direct your attention to Exhibit A:
She isn’t wrong, with only one addition; he will take down the entire world as well. Clearly.
I agree, he is a type of person to anchor on to anything that can sustain his own egocentric power. In fact, the time ticks till he decides that releasing another batch of Epstein files would prove advantageous to distract people from the genocide and war crimes he is commiting.
Oh yeah, the black and white world, where only one thing can be bad.
On a scale of “accusations made of child prostitution” versus the war crime of aggression, painting the latter as a mere distraction from the former is insane.
Did I stutter?
I do hope it’s not a competition.
There is a minimum-amount of fission-fuel required, AND there is a minimum-amount of conventional-explosives required to compress the fission-fuel until it goes supercritical.
That detonator isn’t going to be small-enough to hide in a vest.
Absolute disinformation.
_ /\ _
JD should stick to fucking couches, not nuclear physics.
I mean, yeah, the Davie Crockett could fit in a back pack, a really big back pack
It is stupid for even more reasons than that. I’ve thought about it back when North Korea had pretend nuclear suicide bombers march on their military parade.
Even if somehow they manage to cram one in a backpack that is carriable by a person, there is no advantage whatsoever given the blast radius. You will have to use a vehicle of sorts to get near the enemy and more importantly away from your friendlies anyway. Whatever distance you can cover on foot afterwards won’t make much of a difference. Might as well make it vehicle borne.
Also the whole point of a suicide vest is to be able to get in the middle of an unaware crowd or near your target before using it. With a nuke you don’t need to be in the middle of a targeted crowd or get that close to your target to have an effect.
I mean, the W54 was small enough to be carried by a person and I don’t think anyone wants even a 1kt device going off near them. So it’s within the realm of possibility even if it does strain credulity as an actual goal Iran was working toward (let alone a solid justification for this bullshit).
Edit: the W54 weighed 51lb (23 kg).
That wouldn’t be a suicide vest, though; it’d be a suicide fat suit.
I don’t think anyone wants even a 1kt device going off near them
Pussies.
“watch closely, because I’m only going to show you once”
He’s talking about a dirty bomb. And, technically, that is quite possible and doable by the Iranians.
It’s a stupid assertion, yes; but the engineering is plausible.
Go rub yerself against bad american people!
Imagine pulling the trigger and you have to endure radiation sickness for days or weeks before you get your virgins, smh.
Do you actually need conventional explosives? I had the impression all they do is reliably stick the big hunks of radioactive material together in a big bomb that needs to be delivered at high speeds and detonate automatically. Wouldn’t it be enough to quickly shove a cylinder into a bigger core, perhaps with a motor or even a tensioned spring?
That of course doesn’t waive the issue of the amount of fissile material, or the fact it needs to be all put together (you can’t spread it around a vest)
It’s not just reliably sticking the two subcritical halves of fissile material together, but keeping them there via inertia long enough for enough of the mass to go critical before the much more minor reactions blow them apart via melting/vaporizing the nearest surfaces.
If you had to halves of an atomic bomb core and just clacked them together mechanically you’d wind up with a lot of heat and a big old pulse of radiation, and if you were the one holding this device you probably would indeed die. But there would be no nuclear explosion in the sense we think of it as compared to actual functional nuclear weapons. At best you’d wind up with an energy release equivalent to a few pounds of TNT, which would be much easier to replicate with… a few pounds of TNT.
This has been explored to death, e.g. via the Demon Core experiments, where a critical mass of fissile material was brought together via manual means and the end result was the release of enough radiation to kill at least two people (albeit certainly not killing them instantly) but no explosion.
This has been explored to death, e.g. via the Demon Core experiments
If I’m not mistaken, in case of the demon core accidents, the reaction was always interrupted by the experimenter frantically separating the two halves, right? Doesn’t mean it would detonate, but using it as an example of why it wouldn’t doesn’t seem to check out if I’m remembering correctly.
The point is that even bringing the parts together until a critical state was reached, the material did not explode. If the Demon Core were left in its critical state like that but otherwise undisturbed, it surely would have melted but would not have gone off like an atom bomb.
To my understanding, you can’t really do more than bring the parts together in a compact arrangement and keep them like that, so if the demon core would stay together (and not, say, get blown apart by the release of energy), then the issue would be a lack of fissile material (or reflectors), no?
See also an image of a nuclear bomb design (I think Little Boy) from Wikipedia, which illustrates the idea of sliding a rod of fissile material into a hollow cylinder, though the bomb did it in reverse. I think the design might be obsolete due to inefficiency, and it might need the tough shell to hold it together (and act as a neutron reflector).
There’s a difference between meltdown, inefficient/low explosion, & efficient high-explosion.
The neutron-emission’s cascading only when the critical-mass is in small-enough a volume,
& the heat it’s producing is making it blow-apart.
( I’ve seen video of 1 million watts of heat being produced by a 1-cubic-metre reactor-core, in a water-cooled reactor… the heat the reaction produces makes the fuel-rods incandescent, or at-least that’s the way it looked, in that video: it may have been Cherenkhov-radiation that I was seeing, or from gamma-rays being converted down to light or something… dunno… )
the more efficient you want the fission-reaction to be, the longer you have to force it together, while it’s blowing-up.
The explosives are required, for bombs, ttbomk.
_ /\ _
This is the same JD Vance that repeatedly falsely claimed immigrants were eating cats and dogs in his home state, is it not?
I’m not saying a nuclear suicide vest couldn’t be done. I’m just saying, JD Vance has claimed lots of things.
Trump is the one who said that. It was during a debate leading up to the 2024 election.
Vance said it too. Pushed it way harder actually.
On national TV. And was immediately called out on it. And doubled down. And people still voted for that pile of waste.
Same debate where he said “I have concepts of a plan”. Whatever happened to his healthcare plan?
This shit again? Last time it was a brief case dirty bomb.
Also known as a snuke
Was that this bad guy in Episode 7?
That’s a lot more feasible. It’s not about the initial damage, but the consequences and the effect on public confidence in security. Which isn’t that high anyway.
‘Iran could develop hulk technology and teleport directly into US schools!’ JD Vance
As if they would ever be concerned about potential violence in schools
Does it negatively affect my billionaire friends? …is the only question they care about
If it might lower the number of children they could sexually assault, Republicans will definitely care.
‘Iran could develop time travel and kill Milton Friedman!’ JD Vance
‘Iran could develop zero point energy and antigravity tech to leave the planet to die in the hellscape we’ve gleefully created while they travel the cosmos!’ JD Vance
‘Iran could develop couches that chop off dicks!’ JD Vance
Well we know that you can teleport to a waffle house
Iran could turn their front line soldiers into beings of pure energy and they could rip the life force right out of a tank.
Holy hell… Iran’s chalk full of Anime Protagonists
POWER OVERWHELMING
JD Vance, also known as a couch fucker, could develop pubic hair within the next 15 years, endangering his aim while peeing as he won’t be able to find his micropenis anymore and won’t be able to shave it out of fear of shaving his micropenis off. Couches would finally be safe.
Spread the word.
public hair
I’d rather it not be visible to the public as I’m a member of the public
Loooool fixed the typo xD
Thanks!
deleted by creator
These fuckers are so inept at propaganda, it’s kinda sad.
Dont underestimate the stupidity of their target audience, and the arrogant complacency of his opposition. Its why we have him in the first place. Twice. Half of the second group is still probably going to sit out the primaries and midterms.
Are they really inept if 40% of the country believe every word?
Yes.
Yeah where are the fantastic usa spindoctors? I mean I hate them as much as anyone else but it’s curious they are no longer around.
Maybe just maybe the trump administration thinks they are so smart and don’t need them? Huffing their own propaganda?
DOGE fired them.
USA could develop a more fuckable couch, and ride us of one problem, but here we are.
Just a reminder that the 9/11 attackers did it with knives.
Box cutters
Only because they were still 1 year away from antimatter explosion vests
Why would having it be in a vest be useful, so it’s concealed until you’re really close? Like, it’s a fucking nuke, it’s not like you need to get in particularly close for it to have the intended effect.
Like, he’s just mashing the image of a suicide bomber in with the fear of nukes to strike as many “panic! danger! scary!” notes as possible.
A tactical nuke within a nuclear bunker could be useful if you wanted to target people important enough to be in that bunker? Perhaps he had the thought of doing such…
so would any explosive device, or chemical agent, or two smaller assassins in a trench coat. If they do go the nuke vest route, I hope they put a bunch of light graphics on it to be really edge lord and scary with it
Maybe JD wants a nuclear death though.
he wants to be able to visit the local gloryholes whenever he wants and not be judged by which side he is on
Maybe a dirty bomb with nuclear materials, but an actual fission bomb on a vest? No. Never mind they don’t have the enriched fuel, never mind just building a working device would be extremely difficult for them and that would be large like the Hiroshima bomb.
This is Iraq Weapons of Mass Distraction all over again. Fuck this administration.
It is actually possible, though it would stretch the definition of “vest.” It’s not something that can really fit on a vest, but I suppose you could hide it in a fat suit, a wheelchair, or a fake pregnancy belly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W54
The W54 was a 1 kiloton bomb that weighed a bit over 50 lbs. It was built to be a man-portable demolition charge. It’s certainly possible for something like that to be built in a way that could be concealed on your person.
It’s not something that can really fit on a vest, but I suppose you could hide it in a fat suit, a wheelchair, or a fake pregnancy belly.
Maybe that’s why people keep backing away from Trump. It’s not incontinence, it’s their dosimeter badges.
I love how inconspicuous it is:
Like something from Looney Tunes.
Yeah. I’m imagining a suicide bomber wearing a huge fat suit like Mike Myers wore when played Fat Bastard. Just a giant fake belly with a literal nuclear bomb concealed inside.
Though really, I think the real problem with a “nuclear suicide vest” is simple practicality. Like, what’s the actual point? The whole point of a suicide vest is to be able to smuggle explosives into an area where they’ll do the most damage. A guy holding a bomb in his hands won’t be let into a crowded bus. Someone holding a pipe bomb is going to cause people to run away from them screaming. A suicide vest bomber seeks to sneak into a crowded space densely packed with many people. Suicide bombers need to get close to large numbers of people. They need a bomb that can be concealed on their person. Otherwise they end up doing no more damage than someone could with a handgun.
But a nuke? You don’t need to sneak the nuke into the stadium. You set it off five blocks away. It doesn’t need to be concealed. If you want to deliver a terrorist nuking, you would instead load it on the back of a truck with heavy radiation shielding. You don’t try to sneak it in to a crowded location. You just try to drive it into a dense urban area or near a critical piece of infrastructure and hope to not set off any radiation detectors along the way. A nuclear truck bomb is a reasonable fear. A nuclear suicide vest is laughable.
It could fit into a suitcase, no?
They cannot build a W54. This would be an early prototype device and that would not fit on a vest. Iran only has enriched uranium, not plutonium (according to news reports). It takes a great deal more uranium than plutonium to build a bomb. About 65ish kilos of +90% enriched for a uranium bomb.
The W54 is a shaped charge implosion device. To build a W54, they’d need plutonium. And the trigger to detonate shaped charges at the right time in the right order. Plus, they need a neutron moderator to limit criticality so it doesn’t detonate with the full potential of the nuclear material. This is all well beyond Iran’s capabilities.
Russia could do it though. Probably China too. North Korea? I think not.
Gun-type nukes are relatively easy to make and can be pretty compact. The hard part is getting the plutonium
I’m not a nuclear weapons designer, I’ve just read some books. But my understanding is that shaped charge implosion is better for Pu designs. It does require much less material to reach criticality. Maybe 8-9kg? vs 65kg for a U device. But I don’t think Iran has been refining Pu, just U.
Whatever, punchable face.
Be careful, I got banned for saying that in Reddit.
He has a shootable face. Fuck fascists. He isn’t a political rival, or someone to be debated in the marketplace of ideas, he is my enemy, an existential threat who espouses every characteristic deplorable in humans, he is ideologically opposite of me in every way, and seeks to control or kill me and those like me, just like his child raping lunatic partner.
Ban me for speaking truth and I’ll go somewhere else, heck, that’s why I just came here from reddit.
spez has AI moderation bots automatically set to permaban anyone even remotely talking of destroying Nazis and Kluxers, so we have a lot of us ending up here, and with that is now the chilling effect.
Normally I get angry at these pathological liars but this lie is so absurdly stupid that it’s actually funny.
Imagine someone driving their van to a parking lot near the white house and then going “Welp, better strap on my suicide nuke that will obliterate the entire city. I see no other way of doing this.”
I mean, people do strap on conventional explosive vests and set them off in crowds. That is not the absurd part.
I think their point is that the van was a much easier storage vessel, with room and penetration power. Getting out of the van and walking 30 feet has miniscule change on the effects of a munition that’s blast radius and fallout are so large.
The entire idea of a vest/backpack/portable device would be more so you can get behind enemy lines by say parachute or such. Although there is no point of a parachute as you don’t need to cushion your fall, and no need of the person if someone was already letting you leave said flying device.
Ah, I missed that point.
That’s because thats the only way it can work with low power explosives slapped together by some group with limited resources.
American civilians killed by Iran made nuclear slingshots and slippping on nuclear banana peels.
Won’t be so funny when you fall and split your pants (nuclear-style).
I will fall face first into a nuclear cream pie
