Other open source software gets similar treatment, with Colorado going as far as explicitly excluding code repositories and container platforms.
Its not enough. Eradicate the bills.
It’s not really a win though. It just means Linux will get blocked by platforms.
The fun part of open source is that someone smarter than me will inevitably just update the existing spoofing tools to include whatever checks those platforms are using.
A number of VPNs have tools to let you spoof browser IDs. It’s useful if you want to access YouTube and pretend you’re on Chrome to get better performance.
You don’t need a VPN to spoof the user agent of a web-browser. Quite literally type User Agent Switcher in the Mozilla plugin page and you’ll have a plethora to choose from.
The problem with this is Chromium based browsers work outside the standards for web-development, they implement features/protocols that Firefox or non-chromium based browsers do not comply with as it does not meet the specifications laid out, this is where you get people saying “Use Chrome if Firefox doesn’t work” but ultimately that’s a load of bull shit.
Follow the standards and specifications and your website will work on literally every browser out there, well, except those that are heavily outdated.
Digital signatures might be required to prove your age. Then spoofing won’t do the trick.
I hope I’m wrong though.
If the pirates have taught me anything, it’s that there’s a way around everything, and someone somewhere is smart enough and bored enough to find it.
@IrateAnteater @hanke if privacy is only for criminals, only criminals will get privacy
That ship sailed years ago. We are all criminals now.
Fuck the platforms. We’ll make our own.
We’re literally on one “we” made on our own right now. So yeah, exactly, we’ll make our own. With blackjack… and hookers. In fact forget the platforms.
With Blackjack and Hookers
oh wow gee thank you for not… [checks notes]… forcing open source developers to write state mandated spyware without compensation
“Thank you for not forcing me to participate in your getting-kicked-in-the-balls program… But perhaps just don’t?”
Waiting for…
403 Unauthorized
We’re sorry, your browser has not provided us with age verification, and so we are unable to show you our cat videos.
Reason:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/148.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36Why are you waiting for this? This is already the reality; example: fansly uses the ID verification service ondato, which only works on chrome browsers and tries to detect “tampered camera feeds”, ofc it doesn’t work on Linux.
Call it Surveillance ID, don’t give in to control freaks.
So what’s the point in the bill then? They’re prepared to accept that open source solutions don’t have to implement it then they have to accept that the whole idea is daft anyway.
Not exactly. They can always take this one step further and make it more difficult to use anything but closed OSs for fundamental applications, like banking. It could come via an ID requirement where authentication goes through some complicated process with proprietary hardware and drivers. That could also come in phases, such as mandating all desktop/laptop distributors require it prior to distribution. Then the tech giants can market it like, “never require a password again, if you have…” effectively marketing back the convenience they helped take. Sooner or later, it’s a piece of shit system that banks and jobs rely on, everybody ends up accepting it while complaining that it makes a terrible password for obvious reasons (ref: your Social Security card).
These laws should hopefully be struck down as unconstitutional because of their invasion of privacy(a violation of the 3rd and 4th amendments) and a general violation of the first amendment.
Removed by mod
We actually “won”? They’re not gonna do something suspicious at all? (͡•_ ͡• )
Although this treatment is still not enough, we need the bill to evaporate from the surface of earth
Its unenforcoble in the first placr
I would not accuse the legislators of any decency of thought only that open source would be far harder to police due to its more nebulous and intermingled path to the client with far less money at the end of it.
There may have also been some big money lobbyists from companies like Google, Amazon, etc, that pointed out how much money it would have cost their poor shareholders to implement.
The entire dynamic is off somehow, so age verification is for the safety of children but won’t be implemented on some platforms for reasons that are by extension more pressing than child safety, as if such reasons might exist. It is almost like age verification is actually nothing to do with child safety.
Ding ding
I haven’t heard anyone saying they want to take this to a referendum in Colorado. If we collect enough signatures, the bill has to go on the November ballot and we can collectively vote it down as a state. Even if we lose, it might buy us time.
Why is no one talking about this? Why is there no info about anyone doing anything right now? All I see are daily threads about how we should do something.
Because it’s difficult, confusing, or sometimes both. I’m not from CO so I can’t speak to whether or not that part is confusing or not (though I’d not be surprised if the average citizen wasn’t even aware this was an option for them.) The hard part would be that you have to collect signatures which eats up time.
Which isn’t to say you shouldn’t do it. I think it’s a great idea!
We were distracted by fucking Jared Polis’ new fling. I wasnt, I contacted my rep in Lakewood about it. Who then voted for it anyways. Fucking suburbs nothing ever changes
The bill passed and was signed. The next option is legal battles.
I imagine that, while good on the surface, the apps that will then require the age information called from the OS will just reject any platform that doesn’t provide it, essentially segregating the internet.
Which, adding more and more friction makes it more likely that users will just give up and submit to giving up their privacy.
But that isn’t mandated in the laws
Regardless they can destroy the clearnet and we’ll make our own internet with blackjack and hookers
Yet.
But it doesn’t need to be once the data exists, corporations can build their websites however they like once the data is mandated to exist. Think about how your browser, if not chrome, will often break/slow down on YouTube because google wants you to use chrome/have ads play on YouTube. Or how captcha will just sometimes break and force you to use a chrome browser (which exposes a bunch of data)…cause google again. None of that is mandated by law.
Don’t forget the legislation is funded by Meta. They want that delicious, scrumptious data that will help them legally avoid COPPA and target/collect data on child accounts and get them addicted while young.
And I know we will. We’re cool like that.
I expect I’ll need a phone that I turn on from time to time that’s got all my details logged so I can access things like banking and tax.
It’s back to the same question from the early days of the Internet. “How do you know the person you are talking to isn’t a cat?”. How can you know they aren’t a cat or maybe a clever monkey taking a break from typing Shakespeare, or how old they are, or who they even are?
You can’t.
You can implement every security measure available and anyone can simply lie or bypass it.
If by some miracle they actually implemented some age verification tech for OS and websites and the Internet as a whole, it will just pop up an underground market of “fake IDs” or hacks to get past it.
Absolutely we would, we’re paying attention. Most people aren’t.
What I worry about is the longterm effects. Look at children who have grown up with iphones. Most of them don’t know that other apps exist outside of their locked down appstore.
What scares me is the normalization through the generations of the surveillance state. Remember what we used to call spyware? I’d hazard a guess that basically every corporate application could be classified as spyware given the amount of data they collect on a user. But we’ve largely stopped using the term.
Chrome is spyware, but if you called it that you’d be met with “bro, what? It’s a browser” or even worse “so? I need it to access the internet”
Same with Flock and Ring and all the smartphone apps with location access we carry around all day.
We’ve slowly given away every last shred of privacy and have no increased security or happiness from it. In fact I believe our safety and security is FAR worse under mass surveillance than if we simply “did nothing”. Surveillance and police and punishment do not really stop crime or help protect anyone, it just opens up dozens of other avenues for harm.
Also, I don’t know about you guys, but I feel icky being out in public now. I’m so painfully aware that I’m being filmed from 15 different angles as I walk or drive or do anything, I feel like I’m being stalked and it’s creepy.
This is why my glasses now have an IR blocking coating to interrupt facial recognition somewhat.
Not that they don’t have gait tracking or other methods 🙃
Time to start a new fashion trend. Algorithm scrambling cloaks and trench coats lol. Welcome to the bladerunner/cyberpunk era.
Even better idea for a new fashion trend. Cans of black spray paint and paintball gun accessories, with a cute little strap. And if a few cameras get accidentally blinded well that’s just the price we are willing to pay to slay.
