• Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 小时前

    This is one of the most effective propaganda lines to keep idiots voting for less taxes for the rich and corporations.

    You didn’t stop paying taxes, you started getting services and representation in your legislature in exchange for paying taxes.

    Ironically, you guys pay taxes to Israel in exchange for nothing now.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 小时前

      you guys pay taxes to Israel in exchange for nothing now.

      Nonsense, we get free trips to the desert (god’s idea of a chosen land) to go lick rocks!

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 小时前

    Ugh. How does MA have to keep reminding this part of history?

    No taxation WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. Having a voice was the important part. But asking people to parse a conditional is too much.

    “If you breathe mercury, jump off a bridge.”
    “You’re telling me to jump off a bridge!???”

  • damwab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 小时前

    Then don’t get the fireworks? I’m a huge advocate to just ban the entire thing worldwide anyways. Let the cities organize big shows but no private sales, it’s massively wasteful for both your pockets and the environment.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 小时前

    When we quit paying taxes… to England.

    It’s a half thought, but anything sounds deep to a giant idiot.

    • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 小时前

      Oh get over yourself. Most of us who did 6-7th grade history understand that the “no taxes” period of the Rev War was about everyone understanding if they cut off england they could take this massive new country for themselves. It wasn’t but a few years before Hamilton and the rest had do the treasury and more.

      It isn’t that it is “deep”, it is that is a silly little jab at history.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 小时前

        Taxes pay for community benefits and projects like roads and police and fire services and public education and (ideally) healthcare. Those paying taxes should have representatives to help ensure their constituents are benefiting from the taxes they’re providing.

        The American colonies were being taxed without representation and therefore meaningful benefits from the taxes they were paying. The British government was present in the colonies, but they were there for the purpose of trade and tax collection to benefit of the Crown and those in England.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 小时前

        It’s not silly. It’s ignorant and dangerous.

        America is very broken, but the concept of taxes is how we have roads, bridges, first responders, teachers and a number of any decent society’s basic needs that the free market didn’t give a FUCK about.

        Too many ignorant folks who don’t understand a progressive tax system, focus on the wrong “enemy” (the minimum wage either versus the trillionaire) and completely buy into the rhetoric you defend here that perpetuates that. And end up voting for people that take everything, build nothing and create the hell these purple irrationally feared in the first place.

        And you expect that general public to have internalized nuanced revolutionary war history to the point that they naturally draw any of that from your king of the hill meme?

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 天前

    Are people under the impression that the US revolution and independence was specifically about not paying taxes? That’s some libertarian shit right there.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 天前

        I distinctly remember writing some report about taxation without representation, thinking it was some super important American principle. I was real confused when I learned about Puerto Rico

          • Varpeggio@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 小时前

            Wait, why?! DC doesn’t get proper representation. Or are you joking?

            In any case, to say the people of the 50 states are adequately represented is foolish.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 小时前

              DC isn’t a state or in one. The original idea was that it wouldn’t be a meaningful permanent residence, but as the federal government grew it became a real major city with a lot of permanent residents.

              They have 1 non voting representative, no presence in the senate, and starting in 1961 they’ve had 3 electoral votes for president.

              Oh also in 1973 they were granted the right to elect a mayor and city council rather than being directly governed by the federal government. The federal government still has the constitutional power to overrule them and has done so several times.

              DC wants statehood, and I generally support it (alongside Puerto Rican statehood), but for DC even just giving them a single senator, true home rule off federal land, voting representatives proportional to population, and the ability to gain electoral votes as population grows would be huge.

  • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 小时前

    The U.S. literally started charging insane taxes right as the country began. They even teach Shays Rebellion in school.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 小时前

      The whole story only makes sense through the propaganda lens, brave freedom fighters against an oppressive government taxing them for no reason.

      Then you read the actual context and it’s a bunch of new aristocracy high on slave money mad that the empire refuses to let them expand past the boarders established in a war that benefited them and they are now having to pay taxes for.

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 小时前

    I want to see some fireworks special interest group successfully lobby to have taxes dropped on fireworks in June.

  • thezeesystem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 天前

    You know what’s also not cool. Making using fireworks illegal because it might cause a fire but don’t ban the selling of fireworks.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 天前

      Fireworks enthusiasts should take their fireworks to a fireworks range when they want to use them and keep them locked in a fireworks case when not in use.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 天前

      The greatest punishment from God is that the pretty fireworks that aren’t loud and annoying are also the ones most likely to cause fires

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 小时前

        Do you have any idea how many homeless (and some with homes too) animals die from heart attacks caused by fireworks?

        Or how many people with ptsd, anxiety, or other issues need to cover their windows and ears, just to not have a panic attack?

        All just so a bunch of retards can laugh about their great country.

        Same for all other countries on new year’s eve. Except the ones that banned fireworks.

        I can excuse people having intellectual disabilities and not realizing this. But anyone who does and still chooses to play with fireworks belongs in a re-education camp.

        • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 小时前

          Ive never heard of homeless or animals dying from fireworks. I’ve heard of animals getting frightened by loud noises like fireworks or thunder.

          All firework shows I’ve seen or heard of are planned, last like 10-15 minutes, and happen a handful of times per year. I’m sorry if it’s hard for you to get through some fireworks, but a lot of people really enjoy watching them.

          What do fireworks have to do with a single country? I realize you are talking about July 4, but I’m talking about fireworks in general. This has nothing to do with America.

          Oh I see, you just want to call anyone who doesn’t agree with you a retard. Classy.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 天前

        They’re boring, loud, and pointless.

        I don’t mind going to an actual coordinated show at a local beach, but every individual douchebag just shooting them off in their backyard for funsies is a fucking loser.

      • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 天前

        I can only speak for myself, but I do think fireworks should be much more regulated. Each year 10,000 people get hurt from fireworks in the US alone, and it’s pretty horrible for the environment. I do appreciate the cultural importance, so I don’t think completely banning them is the solution, but I think it would be much better if there were just a few organized firework shows, and no more fireworks for private use.

        • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 天前

          That makes a ton of sense. I’m in Canada, where they are regulated. You really only ever see fireworks at organized events put on by towns/cities, and they are always awesome. One of my favourite things to watch as a kid.

          • wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 小时前

            I only know about Canadian fireworks regulations because of Letterkenny. But it definitely seems like there’s a lot more sensibility around their handling there, which I appreciate as an American who has to deal with inbred assholes celebrating their nation by blowing up a small part of it.

        • YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 小时前

          My cats don’t care at all. Fireworks are fun, and if dogs can’t handle that then they’re stupid. I set off a bunch of the big ones that are illegal but can be sold on reservations (I think? I didn’t buy them) for my birthday out in the rural flat middle of nowhere and it was so cool. We had the hardest time lighting them because of the wind and then when we finally got it going we had to sprint away so fast, and we were laughing our asses off. Good mems. TL;DR fuck yo sensitive dumbass dogs

      • Rusty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 天前

        If you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.

        Unless someone can invent the real equivalent of the fireworks Gandalf usef in the LoTR movie, I’m not interested.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 天前

        I have pets and any firework related holiday I have to hole up with them all night to comfort them. And that’s just on the days I know they will have them, basically all of autumn and winter have dickgeads randomly setting off fireworks for god knows what reason. It’s hell

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 天前

      A reminder that the taxes in question were levied to recoup the costs of French and Indian War, which the colonists started.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 天前

        And, which was largely fought (and won) in a way that dramatically benefitted the colonists.

        Ever wonder why there are so many places with French names just slightly inland from the original 13 US colonies have French names?

        • Bayou La Batre, Decatur, Lapine, Leroi, Mon Louis, Dauphin Island, etc. Alabama
        • Louisville, Paris, Versailles, Montpelier, etc. in Kentucky
        • Leroy, Napoleon, Montpelier, Saint Croix, etc. in Indiana
        • Bellaire, Bellefontaine, Louisville, Marietta, etc. in Ohio
        • Dubois, Duquesne, Labelle, Fort le Boeuf, Eau Claire, etc. in Pennsylvania
        • The name “Michigan” itself (originally Ojibwe, but interpreted into French), and a whole lot of parts of that state, including Detroit
        • Ozark (aux arcs), Benoit, Bellefontaine, D’Iberville etc. in Mississippi

        New France went from the Gulf of Mexico north, included all the Great Lakes, and kept going up to Hudson’s Bay. American settlers couldn’t go west without entering New France, so England fought a war to allow the expansion west. It won that war. The resulting treaty gave the British colonists in the Americas a huge amount of territory they could expand into, leaving only a small amount behind for France and its native allies.

        The British colonists in the Americas were asked to help pay for the war that gave them that opportunity to expand west, and they rebelled. And then, after the rebellion, they decided they didn’t need to abide by the terms of the British treaty with the French and took over most of the remaining land that France had been left after that war.

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        Didn’t the boston tea party start because they lowered the price of legally imported (and thus taxed) tea, undermining smugglers?

    • GarboDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 天前

      We just like how the “un fair taxes” they teach is actually way lower than the taxes US citizens have now adays.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 天前

        It really depends on what you’re getting in return. If your taxes paid for your healthcare and education, things would be different

        • GarboDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 天前

          Neither did… well the K-12 education was paid, but it wasn’t the best of qualities. Having to relearn a lot of history and economics in EU now lol.

          Also off topic; was gonna say US had a specific year for when education was free but checking the history, it was really spotty when implemented and heavily disorganized. Aaaand wow found out California broke a treaty against Mexico in 1998 with Proposition 227, where it’s illegal for teachers to speak Spanish (ir any other bilingual language) in public schools. It was heavily lobbied by Californian multimillionaire Ron Unz. We don’t know if that still holds up, cuz what if the kids only speak Spanish?? Or its Spanish class??? Or the teacher is Spanish themself and are trying to find the right words to something and are like ¿cómo se llama esto? faaaahhhh”???

          Anyways USA only has the education part and it’s spotty af lol

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 天前

        The checks were unfair because they went to the crown rather than back to the American people who are paying them in the first place

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 天前

          And paid for wars that were fought for the benefit of the colonists. Similar to how US taxes today are paid to the state and are used to pay for wars that the government claims are for the benefit of the American people.

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 天前

          So what is different now?

          Is Israel, Trump’s ministers’ pockets, insurance company executives, and the military industrial complex executives considered “the american people”?

          • TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 小时前

            Normal the difference is the larger pool of people, and this more money for non citizen things.

            Right now… who the fuck knows

  • 5ha99y@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 天前

    I see taxes as a good solidary thing but we need far stronger regulations or personal interest direction where the tax should go

    • MrEff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 天前

      I would rather my tax dollars don’t go to government investments of ripping Pokémon boosters and magic cards. The military would also balloon more than it already has.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 天前

      No we shouldn’t. Imagine where the taxes would go, and then understand where people would make sure they didn’t go. A shitload of people are racist, self serving, and shortsighted.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 天前

    Hear me out, just start a religion where fireworks are a form of religious ceremony. Although you’ll likely still pay tax on procuring the materials to manufacture the fireworks.