Expected the regex to match the sentence in the last frame…

I’ve seen attempts of regex pre-processors, where you’d get some builder API like:

pattern
  .digits(3)
  .literal(" - ")

Can’t use that in configurations, though, unless you template the configuration, I guess…

Der Vortrag ist so grob gegliedert in:

• Wie bekommt man Playlists und Metadaten aus Spotify raus und kann sie verwerten?
• Wo kann man die Musik legal erwerben? Bei ihm ist ganz viel CDs von Bibliotheken, Freunden, Kollegen ausleihen und eine Privatkopie anfertigen. Sonst eben Flohmärkte.
  https://ncs.io/ und TheFatRat werden noch genannt, für DRM-freie & kostenlose Musik. Leider sind beide kein Creative Commons Lizenz, sondern irgendeine eigene Lizenz.
• Wie bekommt man möglichst vollwertige Metadaten an die erworbene Musik ran? (Hauptsächlich geht’s um MusicBrainz, und dass man auch Metadaten von den CDs und via Spotify-API bekommen kann.)
• Wo packt man die Musik hin, um sie anzuhören? JellyFin ist da sein Mittel der Wahl.
• Fragerunde/Diskussion am Ende, wo noch CDDB und ListenBrainz u.A. genannt werden.

Ist eben ein Erfahrungsbericht, der Leuten einen konkreten Weg aufzeigen will, wie man von Spotify wegkommt. Also ja, da wurde nicht jede Alternative zum Erbrechen recherchiert und ist hauptsächlich interessant, wenn du den gleichen Weg beschreiten willst.

Git-Link: https://git.binary-kitchen.de/j0nas/Spotify-Jellyfin-Export

(Video anschauen ist trotzdem sinnvoll. Das Skript ist nicht wirklich dokumentiert…)

I mean, there’s still some download managers around, for example:

• https://f-droid.org/packages/com.gianlu.aria2app
• https://f-droid.org/packages/com.tachibana.downloader

But yeah, I imagine this functionality is now largely integrated into the apps that want to trigger the download. The advanced downloading functionality can just be a library and then the respective apps just need to strap a UI on top.

The only real advantage of a dedicated app, is that the other app’s APK size can be smaller, which isn’t too big of a deal anymore.

Might also be a product of experience, that you have a need for strict scope definitions.

When I was unexperienced, I would actively look for projects I could do and features to add to them. Because well, most project ideas were too large for me to tackle anyways and I needed the experience.

Now that I have experience, I have multiple long-term projects that could use some love, if I find the time. And I have the experience to tackle virtually any project idea, if I find the time.

Don’t particularly want to add another long-term project into the rotation, so I do spend a lot more time thinking upfront “when will this be finished?”.

One of the big, national grocery store chains here has managed to create a webpage, where:

• you cannot open a product in a new tab, and
• if you click on a product and hit the back-button, it resets the scroll position in the product list all the way to the start.

In effect, the webpage is practically unusable for actually browsing through products. They’re probably missing out on hundreds of thousands in sales, for something that could be fixed for like 50 quid.

Yeah, the title originally said “6.8 is Very Close!”, which confused me quite a bit.

Kann bei weitem nicht so viel Schwarzkümmel reinmachen wie der Koch in dem Video. Bei dem Hummus hätte ich maximal 10 Samen drauf gemacht und kein Öl, sonst schmeckt das nur noch nach Schwarzkümmel

Well, I just meant it was like bee hotels in that it’s a product you can buy to help out critters. I did think it was food, as “buffet” suggests.

Whether food is meaningfully helpful for ants, no idea. Did not overthink it too much in the few seconds until I realized it was poison. 🫠

Found some “ant buffet” in the shop a few months ago and thought “Oh wow, did people learn that those are dying as well and you can buy something like bee hotels for them now?”.

Yeah, it was poison.

Well, them being largely starch/carbs isn’t helping either.

Yeah, it always felt like the worst decisions under Spencer were forced onto him by investors. For sure, there’s some leeway in how you please investors, and she will be given more leeway at the start as well, which could get out of a rut and make things somewhat better.

But ultimately, I still expect her to play the CEO role for a profit-driven corporation. Because that’s what she was hired for. She was not hired to be the saving grace of gamers.

Yeah, still wild to me how they seemingly bought up half the gaming industry and how little output they produce from that…

Yeah, for folks with previous programming experience, I generally recommend the Rust CLI book, particularly the first chapter

It makes you build a small, usable program and shows you concrete ways to handle some intermediate topics, like error handling, unit tests, bundling etc…

Yeah, they have to fight it tooth and nail, because it threatens how they want to do business on a conceptual level. But I also cannot see how they would argue this case.

If another webpage said those publishers are a right cunt (written by AI), that would be defamation for sure. So far, Google was allowed to say those publishers are a right cunt, because they were quoting another webpage.
If they’re not doing that anymore, if they’re not even paraphrasing what another webpage said, but just making own claims, then that’s their own responsibility.

In theory, I could imagine a ruling that says that paraphrasing doesn’t have to be accurate at all times, but in practice, this would be absolute bedlam. Any webpage could publish the wildest misinformation and just say that, oops, they were paraphrasing.
So, even if they can get such ruling through, there would need to be law changes sooner or later, which explicitly make it illegal again.

Yeah, the unscientificness annoys me the most. Doctors have been practically pleading for people to eat more veggies for the past few decades.

Granted, not everyone’s the same. I know a guy who’s allergic or intolerant to so many things that a largely meat-based diet is his only real option. Having a support group for such cases is cool.

Instead, a lot of the posts in that sub talk about pseudo-scientific data, completely ignoring that it is far away from scientific consensus.

Kind of not surprising with the ruling a year or so ago, where Air Canada had to follow through on what its AI chatbot had told a customer.

Well, and I guess, due to basic logic. Any other webpage has to take responsibility for the content they publish, whether it is written by a human or by an LLM. There’s no good reason why Google should be treated differently here.

Still an interesting development, though. There’s no guaranteed way to make an LLM not say something. I guess, what they could do, is to run a regular script over the output before it’s displayed and then, for example, just not display anything, if those publishers’ names show up in the output.

Oh yeah, for sure, but they do mean generative AI in this case, because it’s the hype du jour.

Well, whenever I’ve talked about this in the past, there was always someone who asked “You put (sweet) peanut butter into your savory food?!”.

Wikipedia also says that it commonly contains sweeteners: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut_butter

But yeah, not sure if that’s maybe specifically a thing in the US. They do love to put sugar into everything and I just came across this article, which mentions that when PB&Js became popular in the US, sugar was still seen as good: https://www.thetakeout.com/why-americans-love-peanut-butter-best-vs-rest-of-world-1850648598/