Local man and self-proclaimed “alpha male” Simon Williams, 35, was today spotted scrolling through his phone to double-check what Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, and whichever shirtless ‘manosphere coach’ just went viral on TikTok would like him to do next.

Despite declaring himself a lone wolf who “bows to no one,” Simon appears to have constructed his entire personality out of recycled advice barked at him by other men online, including how to sit, how to eat steak, and the correct facial expression to wear while pretending to own a Bugatti.

“He keeps saying he’s an independent leader of men,” said a friend, “but then he’ll excuse himself mid-conversation to watch a YouTube short of a cigar-chomping influencer explaining the correct way to dominate a handshake. […]


Archived: Wayback Machine (page will load despite the initial error shown at load)

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 month ago

    The guy who wrote that whole “alpha male” bullshit regrets it. Because he was wrong. And has been working to undo that damage for years now.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 month ago

      If it wasn’t him, it would probably be someone else, or some other toxic thing anyway, it’s just the label they’ve given themselves to justify being assholes

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of Charles Darwin regretting On the Origin of Species because it was used to justify race science and eugenics.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        But the alpha male thing is different in that it was discovered that status isn’t really a thing in wild Wolfpacks. The observations from this study used wolves in captivity. The alpha wolf study has been debunked.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Then again: the bulk of humanity lives in shitty captivity of economic shackles 😅.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s ultimately what the eugenecist is selecting for, whether they know it or not. A better slave; an Eloi.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        But evolution is actually real though…

        • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I should have been more specific. He specifically regretted adopting and popularizing the phrase “survival of the fittest” in On the Origin of Species because European imperialists used it to justify genocide and the Atlantic slave trade.

          He wrote The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (which emphasizes cooperation and compassion as crucial for human evolution rather than competition alone) in part as damage control but the cat was already out of the bag.

          These atrocities would have likely happened regardless but he certainly felt guilt over contributing to their justification.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I gotcha… I guess my point was that at least the original thing was based on reality. The “alpha male” wolf thing ended up not even being real.

            • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Meh, it was a woefully inadequate explanation of social behaviour by not acknowledging that it was specific behaviour to a very specific environment. “Survival of the fittest” is also woefully inadequate as an explanation of evolution and creates all sorts of misunderstandings. He would have had an easier time teaching the concept without that phrase.

  • AlecSadler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love people who call themselves an alpha male, because it immediately alerts me that I want nothing to do with them. In fact, I’ll take proactive steps to exclude them.

    Same as someone calling themselves a Trump supporter. Or a fan of QAnon conspiracies. Or someone with a Blue Lives Matter bumper sticker.

  • mikesizachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    All these “men” these cuck fairies look up to are such whiny voiced pansies: Ben shapiro, matt walsh, jordan peterson, kash patel, chrowder, tucker carlson, charlie kirk. They’re all the softest fucks you’ve ever seen, but somehow seen as manly men

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      jordan peterson at least started out appearing confident and like he had his shit together, comparing then to now is hilarious

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      chrowder

      I’m so glad Steven Chowder has pretty much disappeared since that video came out of him abusing his pregnant wife.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    i also follow the lead of other men on the internet, i’m currently a beta male but hope to become stable enough to qualify for release candidate soon, after which it should only be a month or so before i can see full release.

    Lord knows how long it’d take without their assistance.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lol. I call myself “beta” mostly because I don’t want to be affiliated with that alpha nonsense, and I think it’s funny to be assertive about it. Join me, or don’t, it’s your call.

    • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They let you read something like 2-3 articles for free and then, yeah, it’ll show you the paywall - it’s why I include the archived copy when submitting. You can get around it by deleting the cookies for the site in your browser’s data storage if you really want to.

      • Cevilia (she/they/…)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I was able to get at it that way. However, you included the “save page now” link, rather than the archive link. :)

        • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          However, you included the “save page now” link, rather than the archive link. :)

          Omg, what? I didn’t even know there was a URL for that, so I don’t know how I got it - updated, thanks 🙇‍♂️

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Then there are Christians, Conservatives, Liberals, Socialists. Who doesn’t like to glitter their life with some idealization?