Is it still viable to use Signal for privacy in 2026? It’s centralized, and has had many suspicious occurrences in the past.(Unopen source server code, careless whisper exploit which is still active as far as I know, and the whole mobile coin situation.)
Thoughts?
I think for talking to friends and family it’s fine I think.
If you’re someone that would get more scrutiny from goverment organizations because of your activities (journalist, crime boss, sex worker, etc) you might want to use something more secure.
I have no idea what these more secure applications are.Edit: Just did a quick search to see what i2p has for messaging:
I2P has messaging applications such as I2P-Messenger and I2P-Talk, which provide end-to-end encrypted communication without the need for servers. These applications allow for anonymous messaging and file transfers.
I2P-Messenger: A serverless, end-to-end encrypted instant messenger that allows users to chat anonymously. It does not log conversations, ensuring privacy. File transfer is also supported.
I2P-Talk: Another instant messaging application that provides similar security features as I2P-Messenger but is incompatible with it.
The above our super hardcore solutions that isn’t neccesary for regular day to day messaging, but useful for more extreme cases. I’ve never used i2p or these two chat apps so I can’t speak to how well they work.
In my experience, the bigger issue is folks just completely ignore OPSEC once they get on signal.
The centralized component is pretty concerning. Imagine if protests like in Iran earlier this year were to occur in the States. The Feds would immediately seize or DDOS those servers during nationwide unrest, before cutting the internet which is basically an inside out panopticon.
EOD it depends on your threat model. You’re probably not on Signal if your life depends on it anyway.
Plus, its always useful to not have my texts immediately read and sent to advertisers.
If you don’t care about sharing your phone number with Signal and a third-party company (Signal refuses to state what company it is) that send the text message with the activation code to you. And if you don’t care that everything will be saved on servers maintained by Amazon in USA.
Then yes, Signal is the right app for you even in 2026.
But if you do care (and you should) about your phone number and the location of your data, you should focus on something more privacy like XMPP (Snikket would be the easiest way to setup your own server) and SimpleX.
XMPP (for an example Snikket) uses OMEMO and OMEMO is based on Signal Protocol.
OMEMO is probably good enough, but i wouldn’t assume it’s the same quality as the Signal protocol it’s based on (this analysis isn’t too positive: https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/)
You dont have to give it your cell number.
https://theintercept.com/2017/09/28/signal-tutorial-second-phone-number/
https://theintercept.com/2024/07/16/signal-app-privacy-phone-number/
Many people have already commented saying it’s good to go, but I also wanted to add, I have dug into their actual encrypted group messaging protocols a few years ago because I was interested in using it for a different use case, and I would say it’s pretty well thought out. I trust it, I use it daily, and I’ve looked at the code. I’m not, nor have I ever been, an auditor, but I have been paid to do cryptography and red teaming/cyber security from big orgs, so I would say I have some professional experience in the matter.
The client is open source, so it doesn’t matter what the server code is, you can see everything the client sends and therefore tell what possible data is being collected.
It’s run by a non-profit so there’s no shareholders to please.
Your messages and decryption key are not stored on their servers.
It’s been independently audited.
They have publicly posted responses to user information requests where they only provide the account creation date and last access time.
The (admittedly incompetent) US government recommends using Signal (for non-classified information) and top officials have been caught using it (Houthi Working Group).
You can never be 100% sure, but it appears to have excellent security and privacy.
Not to mention the FBI admitted that the only data from Singal they get is when the account signed up and when they last connected and they are very unhappy about so little information.
And the phone number! But still not a crime to be using signal (yet).
Who do you want privacy from and why?
That’s not a rhetorical question. It matters. If you want privacy from corporations and governments doing mass surveillance because you’re against mass surveillance in principle, Signal is great! As long as you don’t give janky apps permission to read your notifications, or you limit what Signal shows in its notifications, your device won’t leak to those kinds of threat actors. You can’t be sure everyone you talk to is as fastidious though.
If the cops, gangsters, or similar are likely to target you and the people you’re talking to directly, there’s a good chance just using Signal without a security plan won’t keep them from getting the contents of the conversation as in this recent incident where the FBI extracted deleted messages from notification logs. To defend against that specific attack, everyone needs to configure Signal to keep message content and contact details out of the notification. Dedicated devices for secure communication set up by someone who knows what they’re doing are ideal in this situation. Signal is still a good choice here, but Signal alone won’t guarantee privacy.
If you’re being targeted by an intelligence agency from a rich country that has allocated a significant budget to surveil you in particular, you’re probably screwed. There’s plenty of public information about how US government officials and contractors are required to work with classified information to get a sense of how you might try to mount a defense. It’s guaranteed to be inconvenient.
agreed and to add to this:
Dedicated devices for secure communication set up by someone who knows what they’re doing are ideal in this situation.
becoming your own expert is unfeasible for 99.999999999999999999999999999999999% of people and expecting it is no different than expecting people to become their own lawyer, dentist, or doctor.
If you’re being targeted by an intelligence agency from a rich country that has allocated a significant budget to surveil you in particular, you’re probably screwed
the bar against protecting yourself from the local police in the united states is MUCH lower than the cia, nsa, mossad, etc. and should be the goal of most projects since it’s the most realistic and the most likely to happen; there’s next to nothing that can be done against he alternatives.
the alternative is that unfeasible ultra high bar and judges in the united states have a history of holding people in jail for years for contempt of court of not providing passwords or using duress like options on their electronic equipment.
Signal for people I know IRL, Simplex for those I don’t.
PRODUCT PITCH: Hey everyone, I have a great idea for a secure / private messaging service.
It’s hosted in the US, subject to its pervasive spying laws including national security letters.
Also I need all your phone numbers.
Also no you can’t host this yourself, I run the only server.
Everyone who uses signal and supports it, is falling for this pitch.
One of the most sus things about Signal is the cult following it has. I really can’t think of any other chat app that will have people coming out of the woodwork advocating for it while telling you not to use anything else. There’s absolutely nothing special about Signal that would warrant this. It’s at best a mediocre user experience, it still handles a lot of things like switching devices really poorly. It’s open source in name only. There’s just no reason why it should be this popular on its own merits.
I think you’re missing historical context. There are more options now, but when Signal came out (or became Signal, after TextSecure), it was the only tool to offer such strong cryptographic properties with its then novel double ratchet algorithm. Compared to OTR and, much worse, all the other crap that was not E2E encrypted at all, it was the first really credible option on a mass scale.
The crypto was reviewed by well-considered experts, and came out looking strong.
Telegram fought for years trying to say they were just as good and in fact better, which is entirely disingenuous considering it’s not an encrypted messaging app.
These things contributed to what you call the cult following. Which wouldn’t be negative (a cult film has a cult following) if not intended to mean “a cult like Scientology”.
But that’s precisely what makes the whole thing cultish in a negative sense. A decade ago you could make the argument that Signal was doing something special, but that hasn’t been the case for a long time. The continued adherence to the app is utterly irrational today.
I read the article in the past, and it is still as flawed as it used to be. You’re quite extremist without much legitimate reason. Signal is and will likely stay for the foreseeable time one of the most secure and private messengers.
Whenever Signal advocates chime in, they never help beat the allegation of being a cult that cannot be reasoned with.
Personal attacks are used by people who lack valid arguments; therefore, I will block you to protect my psychological well-being.
Anyone interested in discussing actual Signal flaws, like the unecessary phone number requirement is free to reply and do so.
bye
Everyone who uses signal and supports it, is falling for this pitch.
No, because it does not reflect the truth. You’ve to see the full picture.
The full picture is that Signal has the most important piece of information you can give anyone online: your phone number (which means your real name and current address). Also that they’re hosted in the US and have close links to the US defense industry.
Did you mean to link a different article, that one doesn’t say anything about defense industry ties (from my quick skim). It does talk about how phone numbers are no longer required when connecting to someone else.
Signal DOES have my phone number, but they can’t tell my government anything other than
- yes I use Signal
- yes I connected to it today
This becomes even less important as the platform gets popular. I know some friends who work in healthcare that report that they’re switching to Signal (and WhatsApp unfortunately) as an alternative to texting/phone calls for staff/department group chats and non-patient related communications.
Signal DOES have my phone number but they can’t tell my government anything other than yes I use Signal yes I connected to it today
This is incorrect. They also have your full name and address by extension, as well as those of everyone you communicate with.
They’re also subject to national security letters, meaning the US state can get that info without a warrant.
Just read the first article I posted, it gets into all this.
The 2nd article is the signal CEO Meredith Whitaker interviewing with lawfare, which is a US defense industry think-tank.
This is incorrect. They also have your full name and address by extension
I didn’t suggest otherwise. This was about whether they can correlate that to additional information. I am already assuming that the US government might try to maliciously compromise the servers, without needing the pretense of national security laws.
I’m not an expert in cryptography or Signals codebase, but my understanding is that the client app uses separate connections to verify the session (something that can be tied to your phone number on a compromised server) and to send a message out. The initial contact discovery process can leak info if you are searching for specific phone numbers, and this could be mitigated by using the QR code or usernames to get an ID directly. The actual pre key fetch is sent as a separate request not tied to your session verification. So outside of timing attacks, it shouldn’t let Signal know who I am talking to day to day even if they know that I have connected to the person at one point.
I think it’s cool that Simplex and Matrix allow selhosting, and especially Simplex’s 2 hop technique. That should make it much more difficult for someone trying to map things out. However if the average person is going to be using the default servers, I don’t see how a compromised server is any less of a problem than with Signal’s ones.
I recommend Signal to non-technical users trying to get away from Facebook/Instagram/whatsapp. I might start recommending Simplex too if it gets popular enough and goes through a similar level of scrutiny that Signal had. I’m already comfortable using a variety of chat platforms / self hosting for myself.
The lack of a phone number requirement does limit the extent of social graph mapping. I hope signal will do away with that requirement as they’ve promised to for some time. The risk though is spam, which is already a problem now that signal is getting popular.
Just read the first article I posted, it gets into all this.
I did look over it again, and I still find the CIA section to be silly. I’ll refer back to these old comments from myself and someone else:
https://lemmy.ca/comment/5401873
https://lemmy.ca/post/16397504/7661724
The 2nd article is the signal CEO Meredith Whitaker interviewing with lawfare, which is a US defense industry think-tank.
Again, I would say this is a big leap. The CEO agreeing to an interview with a think tank that has ties to the defense industry is not the same thing as Signal having ties to the defense industry. She has done many interviews talking about Signal, with a variety of orgs of different ownership and politics
Short 8 min video of actually reading the Privacy Policy:
A lot of people use Signal. It may not be the best solution out there, but it is so, so, so much better than the proprietary alternates.
One good thing is that a normie can easily use it as an alternative to WhatsApp, since the app design is so similar. I mean, it is easy for family and friends to understand and start using Signal, compared to something like Matrix or XMPP.
And if someone needs a little more hardening, they could use the fork called Molly, which has a few more security benefits over the stock app.
Shit these are great features. I had never heard of it before.
Molly is an independent Signal fork for Android with improved features:
Fully FOSS Contains no proprietary blobs, unlike Signal
Encrypted Protects database with Passphrase Encryption
Multi-Device Pair multiple devices to a single account
Material You Extra theme that follows your device palette
UnifiedPush Ungoogled notification system
Automatic Locking When you are gone for a set period of time
RAM Shredding Securely shreds sensitive data
Ooh! And you can add an F-Droid repo!
https://molly.im/fdroid/
Sure I could just look this up, but: know if molly can restore from regular signal backups off the top of your head?
Yes it does ( did it like 5 weeks ago)
I’m 80% sure, it does.
As per usual, the answer is “depends on your threat model”. For a lot of sensitive communications, the centralised design and therefore ability to correlate metadata is a no-go. But if you’re just using it e.g. as a WhatsApp replacement to message your friends, it’s fine. It’s still the most polished and normie-friendly e2ee foss messenger.
Yes. You will find a lot of randos saying no, but the consensus among security professionals and researchers is that it is still the current standard. Not to say that it doesn’t deserve scrutiny or criticism, or that other projects aren’t important to develop.
Also, will I be able to reach people with any alternatives? It’s not like they’ll all switch to the app I choose, or at least I’m not that popular for them to follow me anywhere, well… worse, I still have to open Messenger (FB/meta) from time to time to get in touch with some of them 🤮🤢
They don’t have phone numbers? I will risk the known exposure through the phone system before anything Meta or LinkedIn. Basically if fb or insta is your contact choice, I am going to phone or sms instead.
yeah but it’s a group chat to organise activities, so I don’t really have any other choice
if you are super private person or want to be anonymous, maybe you can choose SimpleX.
IMHO the question depends on :
- who you are (boring, rando, political dissident, journalist, etc)
- who you talk to (family, friends, work, etc)
- what alternatives actually exist
So… sure Signal is not perfect but if you can’t convince your family members to move to DeltaChat it sure beats using WhatsApp, Telegram, etc.
I’m a boring rando but I dare defy Dear Leader so I’m probably being watched.
