• ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s no question that judging women by their appearance is a widespread problem, but doing expensive/unsafe medical things for the sake of appearance is also about personality.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes… a personality often built off the unhealthy relationship society has with women’s physical appearance. Sure, women can not care, but their lives will often unfortunately be much more difficult for it. Even accounting for the effort put into their appearance. These things are not so easily divorced in reality as they are in online discussions.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not ignoring societal pressures, but at some point you have to take responsibility for your priorities. I assume you wouldn’t excuse billionaires as just participating in capitalism and doing what they’re “supposed” to do. The harm of invasive medical procedures and medications for aesthetic reasons seems like a good place to draw the line and say “you have a problem”

          • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            2 months ago

            comparing woman and the societal struggle they are forced through just by existing is not the same as choosing to maintain an evil system of financial oppression on the working class.

            this is a poor argument.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is pretending like it’s all women who do this, or even all the ones who care about their appreance. It’s usually only the extremely wealthy and/or famous. Most normal women don’t see the need for these procedures, but the ones trying to be famous/popular are predisposed to thinking others will look down on them for aging.

    • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think its reasonable to bring attention to the extremely harmful act of women, who are held by society as the beauty standard, are anorexic or abusing weight loss drugs when it isn’t necessary.

      We have countless studies on the ill effects idolizing women with unrealistic body standards, especially to the point they’re harming themselves to achieve them, has on women and young girls. This recent revival of the “heroine chick” beauty standard via eating disorders and GLP1 abuse is a nightmare to the psyche of women and girls, and also does damage the psyche of men and young boys for that matter.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Heroin chic” is the fashion of looking starved and shadowed as if you’re a heroin addict.

        “Heroine chick” is Supergirl

        • bryndos@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          “You are my heroine! And by that I mean lady hero. I don’t want to inject you and listen to jazz”

    • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Judging people they don’t know by their appearance.

      I’ve seen WAY more women tear down other women for their appearance than men. That and the crazy online dating statistics that came out showing women judge people by their appearance way more harshly.

      I don’t know if its a cultural problem or not, but people in general judge others by their appearance. Beautiful men have pretty privilege just as much as women.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m a dude but pretty much all the negative comments I get about my appearance come from women. The most I get from dudes occasionally is something akin to “lol, short” but mostly they compliment the fact that I work out. Women go into details about things they see wrong with me. Like I get that for women complimenting me comes with the risk that I’ll be a weirdo about it (not that I actually would) but you can just not say anything…

    • Dr. Saxon Crawfish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is it, right here. It really doesn’t matter what women do, there will be a legion of people coming out of the woodwork to disapprove. I’m hardly a transhumanist but when it comes to those small modifications to ourselves to feel more attractive, I’m all for it.

  • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because the cosmetics industry spends billions of dollars a year yelling at women that they aren’t good enough.

    They’re working the same bullshit on boys too (publicly) for the last 20 years.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, it’s been going on far longer than 20 years. It’s just been more directly relatable to how women’s appearances have been critiqued since ‘metrosexuality’ was a trend a couple decades ago.

      • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes. I specifically mention 20 years because that is roughly where Neutrogena said at a shareholder meeting that their goal was to addict boys and men to their products like they have to girls and women.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      the thing is, those ppl have seen others with mar-a-lago face. it’s uncanny. still they do it. they are like “i wanna look bad and unnatural”. we have to accept that. their body; their choice.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought it was relatively well known that you’re mostly only noticing people that either have went too far or didn’t respond well to whatever treatment.

        The thing is that the majority mostly fall under two categories; ones that look natural to the person and you don’t notice them or things that the viewer might not find attractive but the person wanted.

        Ie a rhinoplasty to change the side profile of your face via straightening your nose, while maintaining a similar frontal profile.

        Vs

        A rhinoplasty to create a pinched in upturned nose similar to a bratz doll

        Both are rhinoplasty, but achieve quite different goals. Im just saying it’s complex.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          if you have seen the person before, you will always notice and it will be uncanny. you can even notice just botox as soon as a person speaks and it’s weird.

          but it’s also a matter of taste, like a piercing, for example. some ppl will be like “nooo, what did you do to your perfect face” and others will be like “i’m into that”. the question is what ones priorities are. do they want to look well for others and if so, whom? or do they do it for themselves and it doesn’t matter if others are weirded out.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          also, depending on personal preference, “too far” is usually any change. it’s hard to top thousands of years of human evolution. even a cute face with a medium size scar often looks good to most ppl; better even, than the outcome of reconstructive surgery.

    • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not right.

      They are yelling at women that they aren’t good enough… unless they are waring their product. Oh if you use that other product you are just as ugly as you feel inside.

    • Phantaloons@piefed.zipBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is that why every brodude smells like tea-tree oil to high heaven now? Every nu-male must be drinking the same Faceslop and Instaslop trends

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And then that gets hyper magnified through our little pocket black mirrors that most commonly destroy your attention span, thus ability to deeply consider any concept or do deep introspection, and it creates an incentive structure for people to turn themselves into superficial advertisement mascot people, which itself then becomes culturally normalized.

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because society tells attractive women our value is primarily being attractive and losing that is scary since most people aren’t willing to give up the only thing that makes them valuable

    • interrobang
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I got fat, people were assholes to me so much more often. They had no patience for me, it was crazy. I got back in shape and I’m worth courtesy and kindness again, apparently.

      I’m afraid of aging in part because I’m scared to lose that basic human decency again.

      • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        this reminds me of a story. a friend who who underwent HRT and surgical transition early in life with support of her parents. she started dating someone in her mid 20s. he was kind, patient, and gentle to her for the first months of their relationship. then the topic of kids came up. she was upfront with him. “we’d have to adopt. i’m trans” and it was like a lightswitch turned in him. he screamed at her for tricking him and stormed out sticking her with the restaraunt bill. by all of the things that supposedly matter in society, she had done everything right. she was conventionally attractive by femme standards, her physical appearance was so in alignment with femme standards in fact that this secret chud hadn’t even realized she was trans. but still, the moment she couldn’t perform the full societal standard for what it means to be femme presenting, she was met with threats of physical violence, abandoned, and left to fulfill a responsibility that it had been pre-agreed on he would cover.

        and i ask you: who tricked who? the trans woman who in 2013 didn’t want to bring up her transness until she knew she was safe, or the man who said he was an ally up until the moment someone he said he loved turned out to require even basic allyship

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        You do not need to look a certain way to be worthy of respect, kindness, and love. And it’s sick that so many people are such superficial assholes.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Halo effect is real, most people aren’t self aware enough to realize that they do in fact bias their judgements of others based on how attractive they find them.

  • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 months ago

    1). Society tells women they need to do things “preventively” to avoid becoming hideous goblins in a few years. That’s why you see 22 year olds getting Botox - they have been told they have to start paying NOW to avoid wrinkles

    2). Hollywood and entertainment media have normalized unrealistic standards. And you can’t become a newcomer in that space without conforming to the employable look

    3). Gossip media loves to pick apart any millimetre of fat (“Is ______ pregnant? Click to see her baby bump!”) or photo taken in bad lighting (“What is wrong with ______ ‘s health, click to see what our medical specialists have to say”). And then they love to chastise people after they give into plastic surgery (“Click to see ______’s terrible nose job, why DID she do it??”)

    Billions of dollars are made making women feel shitty. Nobody is going to let that cash go because morals.

    • velma
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 months ago

      This meme is part of the system here as well.

      No one in this thread is complaining about ugly women getting these procedures done. They want women to be attractive, but only on their terms.

      • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes it’s irritating that society can celebrate the good qualities of men who aren’t physically attractive (sense of humour, intelligence, kindness, etc.) but has such trouble accepting that a woman who isn’t physically attractive can have worthwhile qualities. We can’t seem to compute when a woman decides that she has other priorities.

  • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh boy a thread about women’s bodies, I’m sure this will be a civil and rational discussion and definitely won’t have misogynistic views throughout the entire thing.

  • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why do people keep inventing ways to make people feel insecure about their appearances? Because there is a lot of money in it, comrade.

    • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, the beauty industry and women’s magazines push an unattainable look to make other people, usually male, lots of money.

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Patriarchy

    e: Some dudes apparently can’t take accountability and they gotta downvote me to prove their point

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just want you to know that I’m downvoting you because the way you express your opinion is facile and simplistic, and honestly helps further the division you purport to critique. Not because I necessarily disagree with the general sentiment you believe you’re trying to convey.

      One word answers to problems are easy, but they rarely accurate enough to actually help solve the issue and generally are used to push people to extreme opinions. It’s much less effort to just spout a catchphrase to push people towards your own personal goal rather than get into an actually beneficial discussion about the ins and outs of how life actually works and how to solve real world problems.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Women put pressure on other women too. Girls can be bullies in school.

      I’m not downvoting you, but I am disputing the assertion that only men uphold unfair standards.

      • Chloé 🥕
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        patriarchy ultimately benefits men*, but all people can wield it for at least crumbs of power

        when you’re a woman who conforms to patriarchal standards, stepping on the women who don’t helps you look better in the eyes of men*, and so it gives you more power relative to the women you stepped on

        * i am talking about men as a social class here, not men as individual people. before someone not-all-men’s me.

      • velma
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Internalized misogyny is a thing.

    • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      and if you interrogate where that insecurity has its roots, you will often find the answer is a society that constantly subjects women to judgement for their appearance, be that negative or positive judgement. it is simply the experience of being judged. botox, ozempic, plastic surgery, etc all becomes gender affirming care when you are femme in a society that requires femme identifying people to perform the role of disireable sexual object

      the original post asks why. the original post also is why

      and men have their own experiences with oppositional gaze, too, so we are clear. if you’ve ever heard the phrase “low t” applied to a man in his 30s or later, you have witnessed it

      • RollingZeppelin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        And now we have social media influencers marketing fucking 10 kinds of steroids to children. It’s insanity.

        • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          the best thing you can do to resist it i think is make sure the people in your life know you value them for them and not for their aesthetic charm. everyone tell a friend right now that you think they’re funny, or that you apprecieate their kindness, or that you value their perspective, or anything that’s based on their persona and not their physical appearance. and if you are struck by someone’s physical charm, pause, and take a moment to notice their outfit and compliment that instead. their outfit required them to make choices about their personal sense of style

  • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not a woman, so I could be full of shit. It does seem to me that women face much more pressure to be conventionally attractive, especially in image-intensive jobs like acting.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Very true, and already-attractive women started being told how pretty they were while they were younger so it became part of their identity and sense of self-worth. So they’re vulnerable to the fear of “losing their looks.”

      • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe a bit like kids being told they are “smart” and “gifted” turns a lot of them into workaholics with a fear of skill-based failure.and coping mechanisms around that.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    I lost about 100lbs on a prescription similar to ozempic. The world is much kinder to me now. I got a promotion, more hours working, society is friendlier and kinder. I would recommend anyone considering it talk to their doctor.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    I dunno, I think the tides of public opinion are shifting on ozempic. Mostly because of how absolutely awful being fat is on your body. Though, where it’s priced now it’s going to remain a designer drug for vain, rich assholes with a touch of sour grapes for everyone else.

    In my own opinion I wouldn’t even put it in the same category as those others.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      A healthy body needs fat. As long as you are healthy, you can have fat. The amount and thresholds can vary strongly from person to person.

      • plutopos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d bet the comment was referring to obesity and not just a healthy amount of fat

      • nullspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree, but if we look at the CDC: Percent of adults age 20 and older with overweight, including obesity: 72.4% (August 2021-August 2023)

        72 point freakin’ 4 percent.

        With numbers like that, obesity is more like an epedemic and ozempic is a potential treatment.

    • Lumelore (She/her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ozempic causes GI issues, such as paralysis, and numerous other issues like fatigue and depression because starving yourself isn’t healthy. Just exercise and eat a better diet. Exercise is so good for you that fat people who exercise are actually healthier than people of a healthy weight who are sedentary. No fucking way would I ever go on a weight loss drug.

      • nullspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure where you read that, but as far as I know it doesn’t cause people to starve themselves. It suppresses hunger so they eat a normal amount of food in an era where calorie-dense, hyperpalatable food is the norm.

        Diet and exercise is the gold standard, but some people just can’t regulate their diet for whatever reason. Be it discipline or genetics. Ultimately though it doesn’t matter because the bottom line is a staggering amount of people are at an unhealthy weight.

        Being overweight is so bad for your health that known side effects of a drug like ozempic are negligible in comparison. The ones we know about, anyway.

          • Lumelore (She/her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Thanks for coming in with that. From what I’ve heard from my family members in healthcare I knew it was bad, I just didn’t have any actual data.

          • nullspace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Like with most new drugs it’s something to keep an eye on, though I would be weary of using a source with such a significant financial bias.

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Doctors say all sorts of things.

            The fundamental premise of prescribing medication is that the best medication is no medication.

            Like if someone’s depressed, they should try talking it out before taking anti-depressants.

            Once you accept that premise then the doctor’s job is to motivate people to try talking to a friend, or exercising, before prescribing any medication.

            “A person who’s feeling sad is much more likely to make a full recovery just talking to a friend a few times a week than someone who starts anti-depressants”

            That doesn’t mean that anti-depressants aren’t appropriate for someone who’s really going through it and has exhausted other forms of therapy.

            • Lumelore (She/her)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know all that. I have a lot of family members in healthcare. I responded to you at like 4 am, but I could have given a better response. Still on like 4 hours of sleep lol.

      • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m honestly just waiting to see what kind of new side-effects gets listed in the next 5-10 years with these weightloss drugs. I wouldn’t risk anything with this level new medicine, and I’m struggling with losing weight right now.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like most things, Ozempic is fine by itself. But when you put it in the context of a society obsessed with both unrealistic beauty standards and assigning moral weight to any perceived “flaw,” Ozempic is a fast track to returning to the eating disorder epidemic of the 1980s-2000s.

      Future historians will also note the coincidence of the meteoric rise of Ozempic with the rise of fascism. Making people feel bad about themselves is how the ruling class and patriarchy exert control. They want you to be unhealthily obsessed with your weight, just as they want you to be addicted to drugs, porn, video games, etc. The radical body acceptance movement was a direct threat to their power, and Ozempic has pretty much removed it from the conversation.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know a couple people that are on some of those ozembic type drugs for their weight and it’s done wonders for them. They were obese though, not already at a good weight, and nothing else they tried worked for them because their food cravings were too much for them to deal with. With the drug they are able to manage their diet and maintain a healthy weight effectively.

  • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Self hatred is an industry. The manosphere is one part, and the beauty industry is the other - both trying to make you hate yourself and then sell you the cure. It’s emotional and psychological grifting.

  • velma
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    I kind of hate that this implies “ugly” women will not be judged here for using the same beauty procedures as already attractive women.

    Not to mention that these beauty procedures are also sought out by men.