You’re not supposed to punish dogs (or children for that matter), but reward them for good and wanted behavior. Positive reinforcement learning has a much bigger effect that negative reinforcement. I trained my dog to wait for a signal before eating without any punishments, just rewards when she does what I want. So the dog might not have any “morals” that are keeping it from eating that, but it’s not fear either.

The parallel comes from the argument from rape apologists that say stuff like “men can’t control themselves, it’s like putting a juicy stake in front of a dog”. It’s a disgusting argument shifting blame to the way women dress, saying they provoked them. The message here comes straight from that, debunking the whole “dogs can’t control themselves so men can’t either” argument.

As for whether the dog would eat that while the trainer isn’t there, I don’t know about that. I trained my dog not to eat without a signal, and I have been testing her to see how well she responds to that by literally leaving the room for a while and seeing what she does. I always come back to the untouched food and her lying patiently in front of it. And it’s not just me, there are a ton of videos of people doing the same and leaving their dogs alone with the food, some of these videos even part of an earlier iteration of this same trend.

Also, I don’t think it matters that the dog didn’t train itself. In fact, I think it says exactly what it should, that we should stop hiding behind the “boys will be boys” argument and teach our boys and men how to behave.

Those are called Progressive Web Apps (PWA). You can use firefox to add the website to your desktop like this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps/Guides/Installing

Once you do, when you open the app it should have just the website without the tabs and everything else firefox does.

Significantly better than several hours od most of the internet being down.

Breezy Weather

Not affiliated, just discovered this amazing app relatively recently.

Breezy Weather

Breezy Weather

This isn’t foolproof. A lot of malware these days is resistant to analysis because they can detect that they’re running in a sandbox and refuse to run the malicioua code.

Yeah, if you’ve got two EFI partitions on separate disks and one is for Windows while the other is for your Linux, you’re good. Windows likes to reinstall its bootloader which sets it as the default and sometimes overwrites the Linux bootloader, but not if it’s on a different EFI partition, then it doesn’t “know” about it.

1. This is with systemd-boot, which I switched to because it’s easier to use a unified kernel image with, but it should work just fine with grub as well. The last step will sign everything that needs to be signed, including grub and the kernel images.
2. You only need to trigger a re-sign if you update grub using grub-install. If you just change the grub config, you don’t need to re-sign it because the config is loaded once the signed grub is already booted. This is another reason why I went with systemd-boot and unified kernel images, because I work with sensitive data and maybe I’m a bit too paranoid, and don’t want anyone to be able to tamper with my boot in any way. This is also possible with grub and using an encrypted boot partition, but systemd + UKI + full system encryption was just easier. If you’re not worried about evil maid attacks and just want secure boot, grub will work with no additional setup.
3. No issues with the pacman hook, it triggers every time there’s a kernel update or nvidia update, and since I’m using mkinitcpio and UKI, the signing is usually already done by mkinitcpio before the pacman hook is ran, so the pacman hook doesn’t really ever do anything. It’s all done in the mkinitcpio hook.

As for bricking your motherboard, this only happens if your motherboard or any other component uses the microsoft vendor keys as part of the boot sequence, and it’s only really a hard brick if it’s your motherboard that uses it. If it’s any other component, you can remove it and readd the microsoft keys and it’ll work again when you add the component back.

And the key part here is replacing the platform keys. If you just always use the -m flag on sbctl enroll-keys, you’ll enroll both your own keys and microsoft’s, meaning no replacing necessary. If you always use -m, there’s no real risk really, because you’ll always add the microsoft keys that your hardware might need. Plus, if you’re dual booting with windows, you need the -m to have windows secure boot work, anyway.

If you’re extra paranoid, you can also add the -f option which should also include all the keys that your motherboard comes with by default, if it contains more than just microsoft’s keys, but this shouldn’t really be necessary.

I’m saying this as someone who has a self-signed key + kernel + bootloader + dual boot with windows. I have Arch and I dual boot windows, and the setup was literally three commands.

Enable secure boot setup mode and then do the following:

sbctl create-keys to create the keys

sbctl enroll-keys -m to enroll the keys to BIOS, including microsoft keys

sbctl verify | sed -E 's|^.* (/.+) is not signed$|sbctl sign -s "\1"|e' to sign everything that needs to be signed.

And everything is signed automatically on an update with a pacman hook that comes by default when installing sbctl.

That wiki entry lists all the possible ways to do it, for all combinations of bootloaders and secure boot tools. You only need one of them, for example 3.1.4. which is what I just described.

It won’t turn off your TPM, but if you’ve set it up correctly (by using PCR7), the TPM won’t allow decrypting your data without secure boot.

The whole reason Stop Killing Games exists is because of Ubisoft, because they killed off The Crew.

AdventureQuest Worlds my beloved

Let’s not forget about the two extra bard songs, which was the only reason I got it lol.

.config/bash/bashrc

As someone who loves KDE, it drives me crazy that I can’t keep my own in-grid groups like in Windows 11.

Hey, check out Tiled Menu for a menu with a grid.

Ok.

I’d say that the principal claim is that they can’t see your messages and that they have no incriminating data on you. No judge can order them to hand over your data and incriminate you because they don’t have that data. What exactly is the very little data they have is less important.

Yeah, they likely misremembered that it was timestamps instead of IPs.