- cross-posted to:
- streetwear@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- streetwear@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
The discrepancy between the size of pockets in men’s and women’s pants is nuts. I can comfortably fit an entire iPad Mini in my pants pockets, while my gf is lucky to fit her phone in her’s.
Why doesn’t she buy men’s pants with the correct measurements for her needs? Unlike the arbitrary garbage system for women, us guys just have inch measurements of the important stuff.
The inch measurements for men don’t account for wider hips/bum so it takes a bit of trial and error to figure out what size to buy. Whenever I buy men’s trousers I have to buy them 4 or 6 inches bigger than my own waist and then wear a belt to cinch the excess in. It’s kind of a hassle and it’s definitely not considered a put-together look by most women so the appeal is limited to the less fashion conscious of us.
This would be a $10-$20 adjustment at your local tailor.
But adds significant additional cost and complexity.
Wait, you have a local tailor?
Several, actually.
Tell me you live in a major city without telling me you live in a major city.
Probably European, but not necessarily.
European, 20000 inhabitants.
Women usually have smaller waists compared to the width of their hips than men, so the ratio would be off, and she would likely end up with pants that might fit the width of her hips/butt, but are way too loose in the waist area.
I mean, belts exist.
You either get big pockets or tight fitting, sexy clothes. Pick one.
Everyone in this thread is acting like guys’ clothes don’t also have a huge range of fits even within the same measurements…
Let me tell you as a guy with big thighs, the ‘difficult fit’ problem is not unique to women’s clothing. It’s just exacerbated by the norm of tight clothes for women. If you want to wear guy’s clothes for the pockets, you’ll have to deal with the norm of not-tight looks, and that often means belts.
Getting something that has both good form (stylish, fitting) and good function (large pockets) is not easy. For any gender. Especially if you’re not willing to throw on a belt and/or wear something baggy.
You either get big pockets or tight fitting, sexy clothes
I just want to say, this is not true. I have a couple pairs of jeans, some skirts, and a few super cute dresses that all have functional sized pockets and yes some are tight fitting and “sexy”. Even my workout leggings have functional pockets. We can have both, they are just difficult to find because so many companies add pockets that can barely hold a chapstick.
Then do what the other commenter said and compete and drive them out if it’s so undesireable.
My main point still stands that you’re not going to magically get good fits with guy’s clothes either. Especially when a belt is a befuddling option.
That was unnecessarily rude.
Have a nice day 🖖
Most modern pants aren’t waist-high, and the ones that are are almost always aimed at women (called “high-rise” pants). Most pants rest on top of the hips. I (woman with wide hips) usually wear men’s pants and the waist thing is a non-issue. The only issue is that the longer crotch area bunches up when you sit down.
the waist thing is a non-issue
Depends on the shape of your hips. I wore men’s pants almost exclusively until my hips changed a lot during pregnancy and I haven’t been able to find a comfy pair of men’s pants since (and I’m far from the only woman I know with this problem). Glad it works for you, though! The huge pockets are so nice and the fabric is usually sturdier, too.
Oh, I’m sure it does, plus whatever pants you happen to try. I wear men’s athletic pants most of the time these days. Women’s versions are mostly all tight in the crotch and I’ve never been a big fan of fabric crushing my vulva.
Ha, I do miss the extra crotch room. Here’s actually an interesting article about why women’s pants have been getting even tighter in the crotch (spoiler alert - it’s money):
On me, men’s trousers come up to my armpits and have a big flappy area around the crotch, neither of which are appealing.
Probably harder to find pants she likes. Mens clothing tends to be baggy and boxy whereas women’s tend to be more form fitting. Even mens skinny jeans could end up looking baggy depending on her size
There’s a great fashion history podcast called Articles of Interest that covered this early on. Explains why it happened and covers things like the commenter’s suggestion that women buy men’s pants.
https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/pockets-articles-of-interest-3/
My friend once snuck an entire subway footlong into a movie theater by just putting it in his pocket
Who the hell brings subway into a movie theater? And the staff defintely knew there is no hiding the smell of that bread.
Shh. Women’s pants pockets are the only hope those of us that want smaller phones still have.
You gotta go all the way back to a flip phone then. Even 10 years ago a lot of phones poked out of girl’s pockets
I’d be fine with that. I was pretty damn fast at T9 typing back in the day… I might’ve been even faster than touch keyboards. Only could go faster on the old physical keyboards. Harder to typo with real tactical feedback…
iPad Mini … phone
There’s a size difference?
the ipad mini is 195.4mm x 134.8mm
the iphone 17 pro max is 163.4mm x 78mm
those sizes do indeed differ, even if the listed diagonal display sizes only differ by 1.4" (8.3" vs. 6.9")
the reason the widths are so different is because the ipad mini has much thicker bezels but more importantly because it has a much squarer aspect ratio. the squarer aspect ratio means with a “similarly sized” display when only counting the diagonal you get much more width. while almost 7 inches is a lot, when you compare it to phones from 8 years ago it’s not actually that much bigger, even though back then 16:9 phones were usually under 6 inches.
Well thanks. Though it was more of a joke on modern phones’ phablet size. I’m happy with Xperia these days. Can even reach the whole screen with one hand.
oops i took the joke literally again
Eh, is fine. Thanks for your effort!
Yeah, the iPad Mini is roughly twice as wide as your average phone.
What if I told you that women’s clothing is form-fitting with small pockets because that’s what is popular among women?
Yeah, right? I thought this was settled at least five years ago. Preface: I get we’re not in a
frictionless vacuumfree market with perfectly rational agents acting on perfect information. Auto makers in the US, for example, induce demand for massive fuck-off pickup trucks – which exploit regulatory loopholes and are worse than standard cars for most people – by driving down the supply of alternatives and massively marketing trucks to people who categorically don’t need them.However, pants are an obvious case where you can’t have both: you can’t have normal-sized pockets (let alone the Felix the Cat-ass ones men can have with cargo pants) and elegant, form-fitting clothing. Demand always exists for big pockets because big pockets are objectively beneficial, but at a population level in a zero-sum game, women prefer form (fitting) over function (bigger pockets). This does leave a minority who actually would prefer and buy the larger pockets, but because this is a minority, it’s also the minority of supply, and these women are faced with fewer options. Because the supply of pants is highly elastic, the amount of pants with good pockets is probably close to its actual demand – even accounting for imperfect information where some women may truly want but just not know how to buy them. It’s also true that demand for bigger pants would go up if purses weren’t so normalized among women, but they are, and there’s not a strong force acting to reverse that.
On a personal note: I don’t get what the big deal is (I mean I do, but not from what I’d see myself wearing); the women I’ve known who wear looser pants with baggier pockets to me have usually looked better.
I’ll give you points for the elegant part because formal dresses are hard to add pockets to. But my bootie is currently sitting in a pair of form fitting flare jeans with functional sized pockets. There are pockets added to workout leggings to at least carry phone, ID, and keys in. I also have some cute skirts and dresses with functional sized pockets. I don’t want cargo pants size pockets, but at least enough to hold my ID and some cash without fear of losing them.
These things do exist, they are just hard to find because companies don’t manufacture them. Most women I know would buy pants with functional sized pockets even if they didn’t use them and pretty much every woman I know has complained about our barely able to hold a chapstick sized pockets.
I appreciate the insight; I don’t buy these products, so hearing from someone who does is helpful. I guess at the end of the day there still have to be forces pushing these companies not to add/enlarge pockets, because any economic model would say that corporations – who’d burn your house down if it saved them a nickel – know that this debate has been going on, have probably run countless trials, focus groups, etc., and would pounce on this the second they saw profit.
- Purses do alleviate this burden on corporations a lot. If purses disappeared overnight, the children working in Southeast Asian jean sweatshops would be in for a bad, bad morning. (I’d also say I don’t think this is a conspiracy to sell purses, as the market’s barrier for entry is low enough and purses already commonplace enough that they’d only be hurting themselves.)
- At minumum there’s always some tradeoff when you have pockets. I’d bet that, beyond the baseline material cost of making pockets, it costs more and more in labor to hide the pockets as the pants become more form-fitting and the pockets become larger.
- So even if you could make something that’s form-fitting with normal pockets (assuming no noticeable trade-off in form), it’d probably cost more at a price women aren’t willing to pay in an age of expansive wardrobes and fast fashion.
That’s just a guess going off what you’ve said, which I believe – mostly, anyway, since it feels like larger pockets would always diminish form-fitting in at least some small way.
So first off, I want to say I really appreciate how respectful your comment is. I’ve voiced my opinion on this topic before and oftentimes guys get pretty freaking rude. I’ve seen some guys get really nasty with women voicing an opinion specifically about women’s pockets before. So I truly do appreciate you.
IMO, it is likely that fashion companies make too much money off of purses to add pockets. Why add a small amount of fabric for pennies when you could sell an entire accessory for $15+, and that’s a cheap purse, many can go for a significant amount more.
I also believe there is also an element of sexism that is baked in from over a century ago. Many of the comments that are “if women wanted them, they would have them” echo the same comments on flyers against pockets from the 1910s. A great book about this topic is Pockets An Intimate History of How We Keep Things by Hannah Carlson. She pulls a lot of examples from history about why women don’t have pockets and how long we have been asking why we don’t, she incudes an article from the NYT from 1899 asking that question. Another example is when women were fighting for our right to vote, the antis thought we could hide things in pockets like flyers or it was assumed we would use them for scandalous things like tobacco and our own money. Women also used to have pockets in skirts for a long time, but as we gained rights, purses were pushed in and pockets were pushed out.
To your second point, I don’t think it would cost that much and definitely not so much that women wouldn’t purchase them. Below is a picture of two pair of jeans I own. Both are thin in the thighs with flares at the bottom and cost roughly the same amount. The one on the right, the pocket barely goes up to my second knuckle, these are jeans that I can maybe clip my knife and keep a lighter in one pocket, but it’s likely the lighter will fall out. The one on the left, while not as large as men’s pockets, fits my entire hand, I can keep my phone, cash, or ID in those pockets without having to worry about them falling out. The amount of fabric between the two is not that much and the cost would not be too crazy.
Again, I super appreciate your very respectful comment 💚
I’ll drop this link to a video that goes over pocket fashion history but from what I know of it the option of large pockets largely never existed for women in a meaningful way. By the time we as a society moved away from men using under garment bags we never gave women the same option.
But yes, currently it’s popular. There is pressure to wear form fitting clothing. There is pressure to have a bag to accomodate the lack of pockets. This will continue a perpetual demand for small/false pockets.
Women never got the option to buy pants with pockets. It was decided for us and now it’s intentional to prop up the purse industry, one of the most profitable items in fashion.
Check my other comment, pants with pockets are widely available.
I saw your comment. You’re wrong.
No, they are available online. That’s not the same thing. Buying clothes online is a gamble especially in women’s clothing where the sizing is all over the place and the numbers are arbitrary.
I promise those retailers do not carry pants with real pockets in physical stores. I have, on multiple occasions, bought clothing in the men’s dept after checking all the available options in the women’s dept.
I think the original post shows it’s not that uniform across all of womanhood.
Yup. If you made men’s clothing with no pockets, you’d have a bunch of unsold inventory.
People are buying these clothes.
Cue men telling us that it’s our fault because we don’t have pockets because we only buy pants with no pockets.
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
I thought this was mostly a joke, but there really are men in the comments telling us to just buy men’s pants 🙄
Yeah, I love when men tell me about how they know women’s clothing better than us. :)
Well nobody stops you from buy men pants.
Yes yes I know not that easy. But it could start a protest
Forgetting women need pants that also fit
As a male, i only have like 1 or 2 pairs of paints that actually fit me nicely, otherwise they are extra baggy, a little long in the leg, or a little wide in the waist. Its all manageable by rolling the cuffs or wearing a belt but casual mens clothing in general usually fits “good enough”.
Theres a lot of men whom lean more into the toxic masculinity side who will even make fun of men wearing well fitting clothing like fitted shirts, usually this stems from jealously of the fitted shirt showing off their muscles while the other is wearing a free t shirt from a beer case that barely covers his gut.
Depending on what you mean with fit.
Because you can wear almost anything that is a bit too big and it will fit in some way.
And at least most men wouldn’t notice that it is not as pretty as a perfect fit. I assume woman would notice right away though.
I just bought a pair of men’s sweatpants (with giant pockets) and I’m over the moon with how well they fit.
I also buy men’s shoes almost exclusively, because they are more comfortable. My men’s Hey Dude winter boots are the most comfortable winter shoes I’ve ever owned. They make women’s, but men’s shit is often more comfortable.
Even my skinny mini gen z sister in law has taken to wearing men’s (she fits boys sizes tbh) jeans and she rocks them well.
Not to state the obvious here but you can probably find “men” pants that fit if you actually try to.
I mean sometimes the only way you could tell the difference between a “woman” and a “man” pair of jeans was literally that one had pockets and the other did not.
But I agree that women clothes should have actual pockets like wtf is up with that
You can’t buy those because the patriarchy is preventing them. First you need female investors, managers and designers to make them.
Not all men are neoliberals
I mostly wear dresses as I find them to be the most comfortable option, and I’ve only bought them with pockets for a long time now. No pockets? No sale.
Dress pockets, if done well, are god tier
Why I wear scrub pants 90% of the time. Deep pockets, easy to clean, still look pretty good, cheap as fuck at most overstock stores.
Omg and they come in so many colors too been looking for something cheap, comfy, and “repeatable”. Will have to give these a try
And patterns! You can find seasonal, trademarked characters, whatever you’re looking for! All just comes down to brands. It’s wild how many variations you can find.
I live with a couple of trans men that occasionally wear women’s jeans, and they got so fed up with the pocket size that they just went and bought some cheap fabric and sewed their own massive pocket extensions.
That’s what I’ve started to do! One of my pants didn’t not have pocket, it had FAKE pockets, with zippers but not fabric, just… zippers for decoration? I started with those and after seeing that it was not that difficult, I started adding/widening all pockets everywhere made out of old clothes. POCKETS yeey!!!
Step 1: Sell shirt that requires new bras
Step 2: Sell new bras
Step 3: Profit?
That’s called vertical integration.
They start lacing their bras with a powder that makes breasts grow so you have to keep buying new bras
With only a little bit of cancer and microplastics
MarksCustomers can have a little bit of cancer, as a treat.Don’t worry, once average boob size gets outrageously large, they’ll start lacing it with another powder to shrink them down again which can increase their cancer benefits package from the previous powder by up to 300%
Sign me up!
I work in a place that requires everyone entering to pull out their pockets for a few years.
Still amazed at the tiny front pockets most women have. Recently I’ve been seeing pants where the front pocket is completely fake.
As an aside, some garments (especially fancy ones) have pockets that are sewn shut so that they stay flat in transport and lay perfectly on a mannequin, but with thin thread and loose stitches so that it’s easy to pull them out with just a few quick snips. Same with the back vent on long coats. It would be difficult to pack and transport them neatly and non destructively (with flappy bits all over the pace and pockets that could get stuck on machinery) but the stitches are weak and meant to be removed by the end consumer just the same as the tags are meant to be removed. Although I did have a coworker who wore fancy sneakers with the tag still on which was an absolutely mystifying thing to see on multiple levels at a healthcare job, but apparently that’s some kind of sneaker culture thing (and while they were a lovely person they did eventually decide that healthcare was not their jam).
And yet, someone bought those pants and is wearing them.
I was in Target today so I wandered over and put my hand in two pairs of every style of women’s jeans. I tried two pairs in case one pair was poorly manufactured.
The furthest I could fit my hand was to the part where my thumb connects to the rest of my hand. That was in _one pair _not both from the same style. They were Levi’s 501 jeans.
Every other pair of jeans that I tried only went to my knuckles.
I also tried a couple of Levi 511 in the men’s section. They were shallower than I expected. They only went just past the bony part of my wrist.
The person who manages to design discreet detachable pockets will be a millionaire.
What about a detachable pocket that’s a fashion accessory, and you hang it from a strap over your shoulder?
It used to be this way. When women were only “allowed” to wear dresses, often they carried a pocket pouch on the inside of the skirt. It went on like a belt under the skirt.
I wear a phone holder on my belt. There are arm bands, fanny packs, flat stretchy belt-adjacent things. Products exist. We just haven’t achieved critical mass of women not interested in carrying purses who are interested in spending the extra shopping effort to find pants or cardigans or button up shirts with near-waist-level pockets (I am discounting boob pockets here).
I never see anyone mention this but, from my experience at least, pockets in women’s clothing tends to be uncomfortable for laying on one’s side.
I like to have the option of having or not having pockets, like with most legging brands.
deleted by creator
