• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 days ago

    False. All our sensory input is slightly delayed, and it takes time for our brain to process it anyway. So the past is the only thing that exists and we are all, always living in it.

    • applebusch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      just because we’re acting on information from the past doesn’t mean we arent still in the now. we just get all our data with a little lag. we still interact with the way things are now, even if it takes a little time for us to perceive it. in some ways we’re constantly operating in the dark, relying on our internal predictions about the world to get us through the short little delay before we can see what happened.

  • kaykay@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    I just wanna give a shoutout to “later” and “some other day” because that’s when I’ll be doing that thing I don’t wanna do!

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    It really annoys me that according to Laplace, a demon knowing the state of any particule in the universe could predict its evolution in the future, but quantum theory just say the opposit. Knowing current state of the univers, you can “predict” everything that has past, but not how it will evolve in the future. Like if present was the cause of everything that happened in the past and we just experiencing time backward.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Knowing current state of the univers, you can “predict” everything that has past

      The observer effect is irreversible. Quantum mechanics is reversible only because the effect technically falls outside of the mechanics.

      In related news, the entropy of a closed system is usually not constant.

      • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wouldn’t the act of observing be baked in from the start, and therefore accounted for?

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t know what you are trying to say. But you can’t predict the state something had before you observed it from the stuff you see.

  • Catoblepas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I believe the documentary The Langoliers was about this

  • wk5ar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    and most of the stars from the sky are already dead so were staring at the past when we look at night sky. also to underestimate someone you have been in the past or forget what you have done and put that to zero value is wrong. just saying in my case at least. i like the now, in the same time i don’t.