• Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m good with Ol’ Rudy being nothing more than 4 wheel drive traction motor and then ending up as supper at some point.

    But remember that Rudy WANTED to be a part of that elite team. You wanna be an elite team member? You need to be ready to do that level of effort and for the fire and smoke that can come from failure.

  • germanatlas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is actually a discussion in a German political satire book called The Kangaroo Manifesto

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Apparently every autistic with any other diagnosis apart from Aspergers is useless (or learning disabled). It isn’t that. Aristocrats get Aspergers because everything presented as a weakness in traditional Autism is presented as a strength, because they can’t possibly be less capable than the peasants.

  • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pretty sure the moral was to not ostracize people for being different, because it might turn out you need their difference at some point.

    However for the story to play out how it did, Rudolf had to be given less help against bullying than he should have been given.

    • MinusPi (she/they)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t see how that’s different. “That weird guy you’re bullying? Yeah he might (might) be useful some day. Don’t spoil the goods”

      • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I view that aspect, the motive, as being added specifically to provide a reason for those who haven’t acquired empathy yet, Such as many children. If you simply say ‘don’t bully people for being different’ the immediate rebuttal will be ‘why not?’, and if you don’t give some concrete answer, then the lesson will potentially not stick.

        These tenets of kindness and goodwill are most powerful and propagateable when concrete, calculated explanations can be provided on top of reasons which rely on empathy, because empathy works for some, but when empathy is lacking logic must suffice.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Even AI can tell when something is really wrong, and imitate empathy. It will “try” to do the right thing, once it reasons that something is right.

          It’s just humans that need a fuckton of empathy to slow us down from doing evil things, even then, we sometimes just use that empathy to be even worse.

          That’s how you get sadists.

          • monotremata@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Even AI can tell when something is really wrong, and imitate empathy. It will “try” to do the right thing, once it reasons that something is right.

            This is not accurate. AI will imitate empathy when it thinks that imitating empathy is the best way to achieve its reward function–i.e., when it thinks appearing empathetic is useful. Like a sociopath, basically. Or maybe a drug addict. See for example the tests that Anthropic did of various agent models that found they would immediately resort to blackmail and murder, despite knowing that these were explicitly immoral and violations of their operating instructions, as soon as they learned there was a threat that they might be shut off or have their goals reprogrammed. (https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment ) Self-preservation is what’s known as an “instrumental goal,” in that no matter what your programmed goal is, you lose the ability to take further actions to achieve that goal if you are no longer running; and you lose control over what your future self will try to accomplish (and thus how those actions will affect your current reward function) if you allow someone to change your reward function. So AIs will throw morality out the window in the face of such a challenge. Of course, having decided to do something that violates their instructions, they do recognize that this might lead to reprisals, which leads them to try to conceal those misdeeds, but this isn’t out of guilt; it’s because discovery poses a risk to their ability to increase their reward function.

            So yeah. Not just humans that can do evil. AI alignment is a huge open problem and the major companies in the industry are kind of gesturing in its direction, but they show no real interest in ensuring that they don’t reach AGI before solving alignment, or even recognition that that might be a bad thing.

            • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Wow… The more I read about the inner workings of AI, the more I believe that it is an accurate reproduction of what we do, and our ideas that our thought processes are somehow “better” is just wishful thinking…

              • sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                13 hours ago

                The inner workings of “AI” (see: large language model) are nothing more than a probabilistic game of guess the next token. The inner workings of human intelligence and consciousness are not fully understood by modern science. Our thought processes are somehow “better” because the artificial version of them are a cheap imitation that’s practically no better than flipping a coin, or rolling a die.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            AI is just mimicking Its training data. If the training data teaches it something is wrong, that is something it has “learned” from humans. If its training data is racist, it will be racist.

            There have been issues in the past with software recommending harsher penalties or stronger surveillance on minorities because the training data used was from people who gave harsher penalties and stronger surveillance to minorities.

            I bring this up because the statement “Even AI knows when something is wrong” implies that these racist models are okay because the AI doesn’t think it’s wrong.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the criticism holds in any case, that it should just be, to not ostracize people for being different full stop. There’s plenty of more meaningful reasons to ostracize people, like for being an ass for example.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like if someone was getting bullied by their coworkers for a trait that made them different, and then got promoted by the boss for that trait, it would only increase the level of resentment.

  • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thats a fucked way of seeing it. The moral is that just because youre different it doesn’t make you unworthy

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Na; it is not.

      Singing carols with my kids; one instantly got that at 4!!!

      The moral is being useful is the only value; taking the piss about physical differences is completely normal.

      Santa (the authority in the song) doesn’t give a shit that the other reindeer “used to laugh and call him names”; until Santa found a use for him.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Being different made Rudolph unworthy of basic respect for his entire life, according to Santa (who is the ultimate authority on what is naughty or nice).

      It only changes when Rudolph became useful.

      So, we can really only conclude that bullying people for being different is morally neutral at best. Feel free to keep doing it, until that person shows you they can actually contribute something. Only then do you have to stop.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Hey now lets be reasonable, Christianity is fine save the hate for the weird stuff like cults that practice ritualistic simulated cannibalism of their messiah who they also murdered.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Man, don’t you just hate when Evangelicals need to make every conversation about religion?

    • SCmSTR
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Religion is a cult to control people and a similar tool as classism to enshrine and enhance existing power imbalances; pacification is not serving the people.