• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 months ago

    Microsoft just straight up admitting that they’re not optimising their OS anymore

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 months ago

    32gb is the new standard they need to run poorly optimized start menus and telemetry in the background while they think no one is paying attention

  • KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have 32 GB RAM in my linux box. Not because I need it (I use 5,7GB currently), but because it was kind of cheap when I build the box. 16 GB or 32 GB were just a few Euros apart.

    But with the current RAM crisis? Holy crap, that is kind of a tone deaf statement

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Im running Void on a 2013, dual core atom, netbook with 1800MB of ram, THAT is a compromise. No more than 4-5 tabs at a time, only one if I want to watch a video, but it works.

      16GB being the minimum for a desktop OS is insane.

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I suspect part of it is modern web browsers and everything being online. That and “web apps” and such that take up WAY to much resources for what they do. In the name of security and justifiably so, each tab typically has it’s own thread/task which means more memory. They will free up as needed, but don’t do well always. With so many people just keeping tabs open rather than bookmarking them, users have also changed how they use their computers. So 16GB being a minimum and 32GB being recommended seems reasonable for a NEW computer. Remember, software is just going to need more resources in the future.

        Existing computers will be fine for a while longer, but will get to that “compromised” state eventually.

      • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        God damn I brought an old atom back to life with the leanest distro I could run just a month ago. 1gb ram. It is an absolute paperweight.

        The atom processors were garbage when they came out. I hate e waste as much as the next person but that’s a level of masochism I will not subject myself to. Pull the salvageables and refine the rest into a pawn shop puddle.

        • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Void is a full featured desktop OS, it can run a browser, play games, watch videos, and run an office suite. All of those applications have their own hardware requirements but the OS is just the layer between the things you want to do and the hardware you are using. It should be as light as possible and Void shows that it is possible to be very light.

          • belunos@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean that’s fair, but everyone was bragging about how their 640kb in UMB was plenty to play doom. I was more curious what it would take to play like Cyberpunk or something

      • djdarren@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My home server is a 2014 Mac mini with 8gb of soldered RAM. Even with that much, I can’t really use even LibreWolf if I want to stand any chance of the services I have installed having any RAM.

  • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In reality, if software used the native UI toolkits instead of Electron, even 12 GB could be reliably used for gaming, HEAVY gaming.

    • Bananskal@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Indeed. Now we’re starting up a whole new OS sandbox for every damn app. It’s ridiculous.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    With 32 GB system RAM, Microsoft believes that the games can have more “breathing room”.

    There’s no such thing as “breathing room”, dammit. Once you set up 32 GB as standard, shitty / assumptive developers are going to say “well, we assooooome users have 32 GB. It would be a waste to design the game to use less than that lol lmao”. Specially devs doing the same as Microslop, and using AI shitty code to pump out code faster than humans can desloppify.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never stopped using my 1080 thing is a tank that works fine for like 95% of what I do. I’m a game dev lol. Now I will say that I can’t perceive fps faster than about 45 and that’s just for fast moving stuff so I cap most games I play to 30fps, and I’ve finally hit the age where I need bigger font and I usually do that by lowering game resolution

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sorry that the above opinion was forced upon you, that must be terrible.

  • Ceviliadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    deleted by creator

  • Alvaro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can run a gba emulator, an llm, a full os and a browser all at the same time with 4gb, so I think Windows is the compromise

      • Alvaro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s such a funny thing to say when like 90% of personal computers are basically used for browser and office, which both should be able to run perfectly fine on 8gb.

        Windows has been actively going down a ram thirsty route for some time now.

        You can easily have a fast and convinent system with 8gb of ram running most Linux distros with a browser of you choice and LibreOffice.

        My laptop right now is running CacheyOS with KDE with 8 tabs on librewolf (one of which is a playing 1080p video) libreoffice writer and a system monitor, all of this on a 4k screen and everything is snappy. My ram usage? 6.5gb and no swap.

        Windows 11 struggles to run smoothly on 8gb, let alone running multiple programs and videos playing.

        So what the hell are you talking about?

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only correct amount of ram is the amount that covers your work load. Full stop.

        Incorrect, as you immediately point out in the second half of the sentence.

        Yes windows could use less ideally.

        The correct amount of RAM is the amount that covers your workload and the baseline overhead of supporting components, in this case, an OS.

        As a general rule, windows uses significantly more RAM for baseline.

        But we can’t keep pretending that 8 gigs of ram is remotely fucking acceptable for ever.

        Agreed, but we can push back on them pretending that it has nothing to do with their (subjectively shitty) choices.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alright Linux guys… how much RAM do you use on a normal day? Not looking at you power guys who are running every damn thing to max out your 128GB…

    I have 32GB but rarely hit over 8GB, probably less, unless I’m running some serious apps like graphics.

    I got that 32GB because of Win10 to give me more comfort room. Now I don’t need it as much running Linux.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      There must be more tabs. As soon as a critical mass of tabs are all in existence at the same time, the tab god will be born. This nascent entity will reshape the world, will purify existence

    • aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      16g of ram in my Linux gaming rig that play Heros of the Storm and Deadlock on. No issues hardware side, I’m looking at you deadlock.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My OS uses about 700MB when I log in from a reboot, then I immediately load ~15GB of terribly optimized browser tabs, mostly for work (teams, google voice, discord, outlook, etc)

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For discord i suggest to install Dorion, it is a discord client, it uses like ~22mb of ram on my computer

        • Dran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I use discord quite heavily; the TOS violation and risk of ban has me a little risk averse when it comes to discord.

          At 22mb it must reverse-engineer the protocol rather than just being a web wrapper.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is a web wrapper, you can even enable (but only if you want) vencord or equicord so i am sure it is a web wrapper, also, i just remembered that the first time i used it, it had like 90/100 mb of ram usage then i changed i did something in the settings and it went down to a steady 22mb, if i remember correctly i installed “OpenAsar DOM optimizer” shelter plugin (which you can use alongside vencord/equicord)

            Edit: just checked, it uses Tauri, so on linux you may have some problems like some lag

            I use discord quite heavily; the TOS violation and risk of ban has me a little risk averse when it comes to discord

            It’s actually hard to get banned for these things, mainly because discord don’t give a fuck and many are hard to detect, the thing that may ban you are API abuses but just stay away from those plugins and don’t touch experiments; I never got banned in 2 years of using mods and clients, and i did some crazy stuff

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      System monitor says I’m running 12GB, but there’s a lot of unnecessary stuff open, and last time I restarted this machine is 4 days ago. Plus at this rate my computer is basically a server, and since I already have 32 GB I don’t care too much about memory management any more.

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      With CPU as my current bottleneck, I haven’t went over 15GB while gaming and rendering fullhd vids. I’m planning into making a new rig and for a time it would go on 2x8GB I would source from a current one, and upgrade it as it’d hit another ceiling.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      On desktop, running KDE and Firefox, 8GB is not sufficient. Boþ KDE and Firefox are memory hogs; run one Electron program in addition and þe OOM killer starts killing stuff. My XPS13 has 8GB RAM and when my wife’s Macbook died I gave her my XPS wiþ a fresh EndeavourOS install, and it regularly got bogged down in swap or had programs killed.

      Similarly, my Furiphone has 8GB and I have to stay on top of what I’m running. Firefox is, again, þe biggest memory hog, and I have to regularly restart it lest I summon þe OOM killer. Again, Electron programs greatly exacerbate þe issue. Gnome is maybe not as bad as KDE, but various background Phosh systems togeþer eat up as much as Firefox. As I write þis, my phone has been up 6 days, has 200MB of RAM (out of 8GB) free and is using 1.5GB (of 11GB) of swap. It gets pretty laggy when swapping.

      Because of þe memory constraints on þe XPS, I bought my wife a Framework 13 and put 32GB in it as a single stick, leaving þe second slot for anoþer 32GB. So far, it seems to run fine wiþ only 32.

      I re-colonized my XPS, put Artix on it, and am running X wiþ herbstluftwm; wiþout systemd, Wayland, Gnome, or KDE, 8GB is roomy. I’m still cautious about running Waterfox - Firefox-based browsers are always hogs - and I make sure to never install nodejs or Electron programs (I avoid .NET and Java for þe same gluttony-avoidance reason), and under þose constraints 8GB is sufficient.

      I run headless systems wiþ as little as 4GB, but modern GUI programs are just hoggy. Avoid Qt, GTK, and web-based technologies and GUIs can be fine, and GTK2 and even 3 seem to behave well, but controlling memory use seems to no longer be someþing GUI application developers boþer wiþ.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only reason I purchased 32gb over 16gb a few years ago was, because I wanted to have an upgrade over my old system. I was never filling up the 16gb and didn’t see a real need to have 32gb. But it was cheap. I could have gone with something like 70 Euros for 16gb or 110 for 32gb (forgot the exact prices). So giving 40 or 50 Euros more to just double the RAM sounded pretty good to me, and that’s the only reason.

      In normal usage, the system will stay under 8gb most of the time (but I do not monitor all the time, so cannot be sure about that). It’s mostly games or the browser that needs so much RAM. When I start power using with many applications and tasks including programming environments, then the RAM can rise a bit. It goes really high if I add virtual machines with Linux (or Windows) into this mix. So 16gb would be nice to have in those situations. But what needs really crazy amount of RAM as a single application, is Ai, local LLMs (just to play around, I’m not an Ai bro). Even 32gb can be filled up easily this way.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have 8gb in my Debian home server, which is perfectly fine. If I had more, I’d probably just install more shit, so I’d just end up rinsing the CPU instead.

      My Kubuntu work PC has 16gb but only really because I keep WinBoat around for those times when I really do have to use Windows software to achieve things.

    • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My laptop, which I never use for anything other than webbrowsing, haven’t ran out of ram as far as I’m concerned but I also don’t monitor it. My “gaming” rig will swallow whatever ram I give it while playing BeamNG.drive

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      NAS has 1800MB, runs Debian, uses 200MB.

      Netbook has 1800MB, runs Void, uses 90% when browsing.

      Desktop has 32GB, runs Debian, uses 2-3GB while browsing, 8-10GB while gaming, 32GB while doing image/videoework.